RE: [boost] 1.30.0-b1: filesystem::path::swap

2003-03-12 Thread Beman Dawes
At 06:18 AM 3/12/2003, Geurt Vos wrote: > >> >Hi, >> >Is there any reason boost::filesystem::path doesn't >> >provide a swap(path &) function? If there is, I think >> >the docs should explain why, but if there isn't, well, >> >can it still be implemented before 1.30.0 goes gold? >> >> Let me t

RE: [boost] 1.30.0-b1: filesystem::path::swap

2003-03-12 Thread Geurt Vos
> >Hi, > >Is there any reason boost::filesystem::path doesn't > >provide a swap(path &) function? If there is, I think > >the docs should explain why, but if there isn't, well, > >can it still be implemented before 1.30.0 goes gold? > > Let me turn the question around and ask what your > ex

Re: [boost] 1.30.0-b1: filesystem::path::swap

2003-03-11 Thread Beman Dawes
At 03:23 AM 3/10/2003, Geurt Vos wrote: >Hi, >Is there any reason boost::filesystem::path doesn't >provide a swap(path &) function? If there is, I think >the docs should explain why, but if there isn't, well, >can it still be implemented before 1.30.0 goes gold? Let me turn the question around and