Beman Dawes said:
At 11:56 AM 2/18/2003, William E. Kempf wrote:
Well, I'm in favor of that, since we're moving at least some of the
documentation to Boost.Book with this release (or so I gathered). So
what's the group opinion on this one?
I'd like to hold off as many changes as possible
At 06:24 PM 2/17/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote:
On Monday 17 February 2003 04:49 pm, Beman Dawes wrote:
Having the docs locally on my own machine is just a lot more
satisfactory. Cheaper, too (my Internet access is metered service.)
Well, you'll have the doc source on your machine, and can
Douglas Gregor said:
On Monday 17 February 2003 04:49 pm, Beman Dawes wrote:
At 02:00 PM 2/17/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote:
They're always available here, regenerated nightly in HTML, DocBook,
FO, PDF, and man pages:
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~gregod/boost/doc/html/libraries.html
That really
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, William E. Kempf wrote:
Douglas Gregor said:
You probably caught me messing with the scripts (and therefore
regenerating the documentation in-place).
Long term, this wouldn't be satisfactory. The scripts should be generated
in a seperate location to minimize the
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
At 06:24 PM 2/17/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote:
Well, you'll have the doc source on your machine, and can generate
whatever
format you want.
Where is this documented? How long does it take? It there a way to only
regenerate the files that change, or
Douglas Paul Gregor said:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, William E. Kempf wrote:
Douglas Gregor said:
A reasonable concern. But if we keep only release versions of
generated documentation in CVS, I don't think it will be too severe.
Intermediate doc changes would either have to be accessed directly
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, William E. Kempf wrote:
If there are no complains, I would _love_ to move BoostBook out of the
sandbox and into its (presumably) permanent place in Boost CVS.
Well, I'm in favor of that, since we're moving at least some of the
documentation to Boost.Book with this
-Original Message-
From: William E. Kempf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This a minor difference here, though. The bjam executable boot straps
fairly easily on most platforms. XSLT processors aren't quite as
convenient. At least that was my experience that last time I tried to
do
At 11:56 AM 2/18/2003, William E. Kempf wrote:
Well, I'm in favor of that, since we're moving at least some of the
documentation to Boost.Book with this release (or so I gathered). So
what's the group opinion on this one?
I'd like to hold off as many changes as possible until after the release.
At 12:04 AM 2/17/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote:
I've removed the HTML-only documentation for these three libraries from
CVS, as the documentation for each is now maintained in BoostBook.
libraryname/index.html forwarding documents are in place to get to the
generated documentation (in doc/html), and
At 12:04 AM 2/17/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote:
I've removed the HTML-only documentation for these three libraries from
CVS,as the documentation for each is now maintained in BoostBook.
libraryname/index.html forwarding documents are in place to get to the
generated documentation (in doc/html), and
On Monday 17 February 2003 11:21 am, Beman Dawes wrote:
Ouch! That means the current HTML docs for these libraries aren't available
to Boosters who depend on CVS to keep up-to-date,
They're always available here, regenerated nightly in HTML, DocBook, FO, PDF,
and man pages:
At 02:00 PM 2/17/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote:
On Monday 17 February 2003 11:21 am, Beman Dawes wrote:
Ouch! That means the current HTML docs for these libraries aren't
available to Boosters who depend on CVS to keep up-to-date,
They're always available here, regenerated nightly in HTML,
We don't want to stick all of the generated HTML into CVS (too big).
If it is too big for the regular CVS, isn't it too big for the distribution
too? How big is big?
This is a radical idea, but maybe that's what's needed.
What if we did this:
1) Create a new CVS repository ala the sandbox for
On Monday 17 February 2003 04:49 pm, Beman Dawes wrote:
At 02:00 PM 2/17/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote:
They're always available here, regenerated nightly in HTML, DocBook, FO,
PDF, and man pages:
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~gregod/boost/doc/html/libraries.html
That really isn't very
I've removed the HTML-only documentation for these three libraries from CVS,
as the documentation for each is now maintained in BoostBook.
libraryname/index.html forwarding documents are in place to get to the
generated documentation (in doc/html), and when we near the release I will
provide a
16 matches
Mail list logo
