RE: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-25 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
Peter Dimov wrote: > Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > > Peter Dimov wrote: > >> > >> Also, please note that I don't mind the _developer summary_ being > >> "aggressive" in its pass/fail reports. There are no "expected > >> failures" there as far as I'm concerned. Every failure needs to be > >> reported in

Re: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-24 Thread Peter Dimov
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > Peter Dimov wrote: >> >> Also, please note that I don't mind the _developer summary_ being >> "aggressive" in its pass/fail reports. There are no "expected >> failures" there as far as I'm concerned. Every failure needs to be >> reported in red, with pass->fail transitions

RE: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-24 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
Peter Dimov wrote: > > We just need to agree on the configuration, here. Currently, we run > > Intel 7.1 in MSVC 6.0 compatibility mode, and Beman probably has his > > configured for 7.0. I am not sure which configuration is more common > > in the real world - assuming that this is the criterion we

RE: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-22 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
Rene Rivera wrote: > >> So > >> having what is essentially a binary indicator is misleading. > > > >As long as it reports things correctly, it's not. > > I'll only say that I agree with Peter's comments on this point. What do you think of the revision that was run against 1.30.0 sources - http:

Re: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-22 Thread Peter Dimov
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > Peter Dimov wrote: >> >> Note also that Beman's intel-win32 toolset passed shared_ptr_test but >> your intel-win32 toolset did not, and I can't distinguish the two in >> expected_results.xml. > > We just need to agree on the configuration, here. Currently, we run > Intel 7

RE: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-22 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
Peter Dimov wrote: > Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > > Peter Dimov wrote: > > > >> The summaries are nice, but the red "broken" thing on the user page > >> may be too intimidating, > > > > When will show the actual status, it shouldn't be (it doesn't yet, > > since some cooperation from library authors i

RE: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-20 Thread Misha Bergal
Oops, sorry That was intended as a private e-mail to Aleksey. My apologies to Peter. Misha Bergal MetaCommunications Engineering ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

RE: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-19 Thread Misha Bergal
My comments to this constructive mail are below: Peter Dimov wrote: > Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: >> Peter Dimov wrote: >> > You do provide me with the tools to eliminate a false red > status, but this is a "guilty unless proven otherwise" > approach; Accurate description. This is what is going to

RE: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-19 Thread Rene Rivera
[2003-06-19] Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: >Rene Rivera wrote: >> [2003-06-18] Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: >> So >> having what is essentially a binary indicator is misleading. > >As long as it reports things correctly, it's not. I'll only say that I agree with Peter's comments on this point. >> ...Indi

Re: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-19 Thread Peter Dimov
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > Peter Dimov wrote: > >> The summaries are nice, but the red "broken" thing on the user page >> may be too intimidating, > > When will show the actual status, it shouldn't be (it doesn't yet, > since > some cooperation from library authors is needed - please see below). > O

RE: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-19 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
Rene Rivera wrote: > [2003-06-18] Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > > > as per > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/20648 are > >available from here: > > > > * user summary page - > >http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/user_summary_page.html > > * developer summary page - >

RE: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-19 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
Peter Dimov wrote: > Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > > ... as per http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/20648 > > are available from here: > > > > * user summary page - > > http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/user_summary_page.html > > * developer summary page - > > > http://boo

Re: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-18 Thread Rene Rivera
[2003-06-18] Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > as per http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/20648 are >available from here: > > * user summary page - >http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/user_summary_page.html > * developer summary page - >http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression

Re: [boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-18 Thread Peter Dimov
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote: > ... as per http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/20648 > are available from here: > > * user summary page - > http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/user_summary_page.html > * developer summary page - > http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/dev

[boost] Experimental audience-targeted regression results

2003-06-18 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
... as per http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/20648 are available from here: * user summary page - http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/user_summary_page.html * developer summary page - http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/developer_summary_page.html Please comm