[boost] filesystem library name RC_1_30_0

2003-03-17 Thread Thomas Witt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Beman, the library name is still fs. I was under the impression that this was only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible boost_filesystem before release. From a pratical point of view fs seems like begging for a nameclash. Thomas

Re: [boost] filesystem library name RC_1_30_0

2003-03-17 Thread Beman Dawes
At 07:17 AM 3/17/2003, Thomas Witt wrote: the library name is still fs. I was under the impression that this was only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible boost_filesystem before release. From a pratical point of view fs seems like begging for a nameclash. Good point. OK,

Re: [boost] Filesystem library name

2003-01-16 Thread David Abrahams
Ulrich Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote: At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote: windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current boost libraries, shouldn't this library be called libboost_filesystem.lib? Yes, I guess.

Re: [jamboost] Re: [boost] Filesystem library name

2003-01-16 Thread Rene Rivera
[2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote: Ulrich Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote: At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote: windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current boost libraries, shouldn't this library be called

Re: [jamboost] Re: [boost] Filesystem library name

2003-01-16 Thread David Abrahams
Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote: Ulrich Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote: At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote: windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current boost

Re: [jamboost] Re: [boost] Filesystem library name

2003-01-16 Thread Rene Rivera
[2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote: Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote: Ulrich Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote: At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote: windows. Judging by the naming convention used by

Re: [boost] Filesystem library name

2003-01-16 Thread Alberto Barbati
Rene Rivera wrote: Not totally right... It should be: libboost_name_API-tag.lib.version Putting the version at the end is somewhat standard. And in my current case of OpenBSD required. That may be standard on OpenBSD, but it's not on Windows, where the last part of the filename is used

[boost] Filesystem library name

2003-01-15 Thread Steven Kirk
Hi, I have just build the filesystem for the first time from the current CVS state and I notice that the filesystem library is called libfs.lib on windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current boost libraries, shouldn't this library be called libboost_filesystem.lib?