At 07:59 AM 3/13/2003, John Maddock wrote:
>* Regex "make boost work better" patch from Lars Gullik Bjønnes
> John Maddock will investigate once new machine working
>
>should be done soon.
OK.
>* PRB with type_traits::is_member_function_pointer
> Would prefer John Maddock or someone else more
At 08:09 AM 3/13/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>Beman Dawes wrote:
>> * [config] BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME
>> Status currently unknown. John? Aleksey?
>
>Dave will take care of it after the release. It's not urgent in any way.
do-list updated. Thanks!
--Beman
__
At 11:42 AM 3/12/2003, Sam Partington wrote:
>Daniel Frey wrote:
>> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>>
>>> * Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
>>>Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
>>
>> We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and
>> thus in the regress
* Regex "make boost work better" patch from Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Maddock will investigate once new machine working
should be done soon.
* PRB with type_traits::is_member_function_pointer
Would prefer John Maddock or someone else more familiar with type
traits regeneration make this c
On Thursday 13 March 2003 08:02 am, Joel Young wrote:
> > "Neal D. Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I reported this. A simple workaround, just remove the dependency from
> > the .spec file.
> >
> > IIRC, it was libpython-devel. This is called python-devel on RH8. My
> > suggestion, just remove
Beman Dawes wrote:
> * [config] BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME
> Status currently unknown. John? Aleksey?
Dave will take care of it after the release. It's not urgent in any way.
Aleksey
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinf
> "Neal D. Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I reported this. A simple workaround, just remove the dependency from the
> .spec file.
> IIRC, it was libpython-devel. This is called python-devel on RH8. My
> suggestion, just remove it from Requires:.
Just put a %if block in the .spec. I don't
At 10:51 AM 3/12/2003, Jaakko Jarvi wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
>
>> Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if
we
>> could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
>>
>
>> * tuples::apply
>>Did this every get resolved? Aleksey? Jaakko?
>
>Aleksey'
At 04:02 AM 3/13/2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>I believe that Malte Starostik is the right person for dealing with this
>issue. I'm pretty sure the different is naming is difference between
>Mandrake and Redhat, but have no idea how to fix it.
>
>And, while we're on it, I think it would be much bett
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 11:50 am, David Abrahams wrote:
> Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Boost.Python private email
> >Final changes promised for Wednesday night.
>
> Those are done. I'd like to watch http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/ go
> through one more successful test cycle.
>
>
Vladimir Prus said:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Doesn't seem to be in the archives. It's from Neal D. Becker 10 Mar
>> >
>> > 2003. Here is the entire message:
>> > >I really appreciate the boost rpms that have been made available.
>> I
>> >
>> > hope
David Abrahams wrote:
> Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Doesn't seem to be in the archives. It's from Neal D. Becker 10 Mar
> >
> > 2003. Here is the entire message:
> > >I really appreciate the boost rpms that have been made available. I
> >
> > hope we
> >
> > >can improve one thi
Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 11:52 AM 3/12/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> >Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> * [status/Jamfile] Jamfile patches for Borland
> >>Need a decision. Dave?
> >
> >I'm also not aware of these issues.
>
> See http://aspn.activestate.
Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doesn't seem to be in the archives. It's from Neal D. Becker 10 Mar
> 2003. Here is the entire message:
>
> >I really appreciate the boost rpms that have been made available. I
> hope we
> >can improve one thing in the upcoming release.
> >
> >rpm -q
At 11:52 AM 3/12/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * [status/Jamfile] Jamfile patches for Borland
>>Need a decision. Dave?
>
>I'm also not aware of these issues.
See http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1566296
Because it is a build relate
At 11:50 AM 3/12/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * Boost.Python private email
>>Final changes promised for Wednesday night.
>
>Those are done.
OK, removed from list.
> I'd like to watch http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/ go
>through one more successful test c
At 10:54 AM 3/12/2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>Beman Dawes wrote:
>> Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if
we
>> could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
>
>> * [bgl] pass by value
>>Awaiting response from Jeremy
>
>Per off-list discussion, I've comitted the c
"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see new features being added to RC_1_30_0.
> Is this the right balance of innovation and stability?
> I've spent several days cleaning up RC_1_30_0 for a large number of platforms.
> It takes a long time to do all the compilations and test
I see new features being added to RC_1_30_0.
Is this the right balance of innovation and stability?
I've spent several days cleaning up RC_1_30_0 for a large number of platforms.
It takes a long time to do all the compilations and tests. Do I have to do this
all over again to salvage my significant
Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * [status/Jamfile] Jamfile patches for Borland
>Need a decision. Dave?
I'm also not aware of these issues.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http:
Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Boost.Python private email
>Final changes promised for Wednesday night.
Those are done. I'd like to watch http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/ go
through one more successful test cycle.
> * [Boost.Python] rpms and small fix for RedHat
>Awaiting reply. Da
Daniel Frey wrote:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>
>> * Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
>>Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
>
> We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and
> thus in the regression tests for some time. When Sam started the
> propo
Beman Dawes wrote:
> Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if we
> could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
> * [bgl] pass by value
>Awaiting response from Jeremy
Per off-list discussion, I've comitted the changes. They are also merged to
RC branch. There may
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
> Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if we
> could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
>
> * tuples::apply
>Did this every get resolved? Aleksey? Jaakko?
Aleksey's message on Feb 15 had slipped by :(
Looking at his pr
Beman Dawes wrote:
>
> * Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
>Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and thus
in the regression tests for some time. When Sam started the proposal,
the branch for 1.30.0 has
Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if we
could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
If you resolve any of these issues, please let me know so I can clear it
off the list.
Thanks,
--Beman
* lexical_cast changes
Kevlin and Terje doing final tests on changes.
26 matches
Mail list logo