Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-22 Thread Matthias Troyer
Thank you very much! Now the Cray people just need to find the jam problem, and I will be able to test more. On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 01:13 PM, John Maddock wrote: While I am still working on these three issues, I could solve the problem with cstdint.hpp. and have attached a context d

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-22 Thread John Maddock
> While I am still working on these three issues, I could solve the > problem with cstdint.hpp. and have attached a context diff of the > changes. The main issue was that short is 32 bit and int is 64 bit on > the Cray: Changes committed, thanks! John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/hom

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-22 Thread Matthias Troyer
Matthias Troyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes I tried to run the boost regression test but the first problem I encountered is that jam does not seem to work on a Cray machine: athos:> sh ./build.sh cc ... ./bootstrap.cc/jam0 -f build.jam --toolset=cc --toolset-root= ./build.sh[3]: 48150 Floating e

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-21 Thread Matthias Troyer
Both CRAY and cray are defined. I have also heard that future Cray compiler versions will have a 16-bit short type, albeit with performance penalties. Matthias On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 01:10 PM, John Maddock wrote: While I am still working on these three issues, I could solve the probl

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-21 Thread John Maddock
> While I am still working on these three issues, I could solve the > problem with cstdint.hpp. and have attached a context diff of the > changes. The main issue was that short is 32 bit and int is 64 bit on > the Cray: I'll commit that, but I would prefer to make the test Cray specific as well as

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-20 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 04:51 PM, David Abrahams wrote: One other thing worth checking if you can't get a stack trace easily: ./bootstrap.cc/jam0 -d12 You may get enough useful output for us to track down the problem. Here is is. I will send a stack trace as soon as I can get it. I ho

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-20 Thread David Abrahams
Matthias Troyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 12:55 PM, John Maddock wrote: >> If you can test and supply patches they would be much >> appreciated, come to >> that, I don't suppose you would like to volunteer to regularly run the >> regression tests on that platf

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-20 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 04:27 PM, Toon Knapen wrote: I tried to run the regression test but the first problem I encountered is that jam does not seem to work on a Cray machine: And what happens if you use make directly ? Same problem if I use make, jam compiles but then crashes Ma

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-20 Thread Toon Knapen
On Monday 20 January 2003 14:03, Matthias Troyer wrote: > On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 12:55 PM, John Maddock wrote: > > If you can test and supply patches they would be much appreciated, > > come to > > that, I don't suppose you would like to volunteer to regularly run the > > regression test

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-20 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 12:55 PM, John Maddock wrote: If you can test and supply patches they would be much appreciated, come to that, I don't suppose you would like to volunteer to regularly run the regression tests on that platform would you (no problem if you can't though)? Testing

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-19 Thread Matthias Troyer
I still have three problems with Cray C++ v. 3.6, but got some parts to compile. They are: i) a problem with template instantiation - here it seems that the compiler might not be correctly installed on our system and I will talk to the Cray engineers. ii) static assertions do not work iii) in so

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-18 Thread Matthias Troyer
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 12:55 PM, John Maddock wrote: 1.) it seems that Cray C++ with the "-h conform" option, which enforces strict standard conformance does not compile this code in boost/filesystem/operations.hpp class directory_iterator : public boost::iterator< std::input

Re: [boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-18 Thread John Maddock
> 1.) it seems that Cray C++ with the "-h conform" option, which enforces > strict standard conformance does not compile this code in > boost/filesystem/operations.hpp > > class directory_iterator >: public boost::iterator< std::input_iterator_tag, >path, std::ptrdiff_t, const p

[boost] Problems with boost on Cray C++ release 3.6

2003-01-18 Thread Matthias Troyer
Dear Boosters, All of our codes are now built on top of boost. Since we might use Cray vector computers more in the future (finally they provides a standard-conforming C++ standard library in release 3.6) we started porting our codes to the Cray. I did not run the full test suite, but just tri