At 04:09 PM 8/16/2003, Daniel Frey wrote:
>Ah, I see. I also saw from Beman's results for the main trunk that the
>fix for checked_delete works as expected. One nit: Beman, you added
>annotations that explain why a test failed. Now the test passes, but the
>annotation is still there...
The note wi
Misha Bergal wrote:
> * there are still some failures on meta-intel-7.1-stlport
I remember I have recompiled the STLPort without wchat_t support for
RC_1_30_0. One of the failure will be resolved if I recompile STLPort with
wchar_t support. What I don't understand is why other tests pass.
--
M
David Abrahams wrote:
> Okay, I fixed that one. Nobody breathe... I'm going to tag it for
> release.
Our results are available now.
Looking at it:
* "static_assert" library name got somehow replaced with "libs".
* there are still some failures on meta-intel-7.1-stlport
--
Misha Bergal
MetaCo
David Abrahams wrote:
> I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the
> RC_1_30_0 branch, though recent test updates at
>
> Would testers for the 1.30.2 release please be sure they're updating to
> RC_1_30_0 and post new results?
Dave,
I believe our results will be ready by 6:00pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
Also the latter run (Win32) stops after "type_traits". The
"utility"-section seems t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>> > http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
>> > contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
>>
>> Also the latter run (Win32) stops after "type_traits". The
>
Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the RC_1_30_0
>> branch, though recent test updates at
>> http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
>> contradict that. I find that very strange because I s
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
> > contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
>
> Also the latter run (Win32) stops after "type_traits". The
> "utility"-section seems to have di
David Abrahams wrote:
I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the RC_1_30_0
branch, though recent test updates at
http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
reproduced those problems and addressed them
David Abrahams wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
Also the latter run (Win32) stops after "type_traits". The
"utility"-section seems to have disappeared. Misha, can you have a look,
please?
Regards,
10 matches
Mail list logo
