Re: [boost] Re: Boost Library Guidelines

2003-04-30 Thread William E. Kempf
Pavol Droba said: > I have noticed a lot of new warnings in the release 1.30. > I absuletely agree, that there is no reason to do some kind of "line by > line" pragma suppression. > > But... > > Most of the new warnings can be easily removed with a static_cast. I > don't understand, why any boost

Re: [boost] Re: Boost Library Guidelines

2003-04-30 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 06:30 am, Pavol Droba wrote: > Most of the new warnings can be easily removed with a static_cast. I don't > understand, why any boost lib have to generate such a warnings. I agree that it would be great from the user's point of view if all of Boost compiled without war

Re: [boost] Re: Boost Library Guidelines

2003-04-30 Thread Pavol Droba
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 10:24:09AM +0100, Ken Hagan wrote: > > William E. Kempf wrote... > >> pragmas. As a "best practice suggestion", it's a great idea... as a > >> requirement, I'd have to voice an opinion against. > > Paul A. Bristow wrote: > > > > I absolutely agree, but I feel it would be u

[boost] Re: Boost Library Guidelines

2003-04-30 Thread Ken Hagan
> William E. Kempf wrote... >> pragmas. As a "best practice suggestion", it's a great idea... as a >> requirement, I'd have to voice an opinion against. Paul A. Bristow wrote: > > I absolutely agree, but I feel it would be useful encourage authors > to try. Playing devil's advocate, but why? Wi