RE: [boost] Re: circular_buffer ver. 3.3 [long]

2003-09-03 Thread Paul A. Bristow
I confirm that the test works on MSVC 7.1 debug and release apparently without warnings at level 4. As noted in another related post, it is not possible to check without separate compilation of the unit_test modules because these produce warnings and the exectuionmonitor requires language extension

[boost] Re: circular_buffer ver. 3.3

2003-09-03 Thread David Abrahams
"Pavel Vozenilek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ... >> Is there some reason you're defining your own iterators instead of >> using iterator_facade or iterator_adaptor? >> > iterator_adaptor is used here, AFAICS. Norm

[boost] Re: circular_buffer ver. 3.3

2003-09-03 Thread Pavel Vozenilek
"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... > Is there some reason you're defining your own iterators instead of > using iterator_facade or iterator_adaptor? > iterator_adaptor is used here, AFAICS. /Pavel ___ Uns

[boost] Re: circular_buffer ver. 3.3

2003-09-02 Thread David Abrahams
"Pavel Vozenilek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > 14. Btw, isn't cb_iterator::operator[]() added by mistake? I have >> > never seen such an operation for iterator. No, iterators do have >> > this operator. >> > Oops, newer used before :-o Is there some reason you're defining your own iterators

Re: [boost] Re: circular_buffer ver. 3.3 [long]

2003-09-02 Thread Jan Gaspar
Hi Pavel! Thank you very much for your comments. I agree with most of them. Thanks also for the picture. Here are my notes to some of your comments. > > Few notes to latest source: > > 1. circular_buffer_adaptor.html: the link in > >"The circular_buffer_space_optimized is defined in > the