Fernando Cacciola wrote:
[...]
>> Maybe it would be better to simply disable EH overhead with some
>> BOOST macro. _That_ would be really really great then...
>>
>>
> Which EH overhead?
Exception Handlings. Actually, there is one: BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS but I
cannot compile with -fno-exceptions u
"Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> David B. Held wrote:
>
> > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> David Abrahams wrote:
> >>
> >> > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
David B. Held wrote:
> "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>> > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >> I would like some feedback about the logic behind it.
>> >
>> > Do you have a use-case for
"Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
> > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> I would like some feedback about the logic behind it.
> >
> > Do you have a use-case for this?
>
> Sorry, I do not underst
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I would like some feedback about the logic behind it.
>
> Do you have a use-case for this?
Sorry, I do not understand; you mean someone that would want to use it this
way? I am not sure, but it would be better
Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
[...]
> typelists but I guess some derivative of tuple<> will be better
> eventually. The member function postponed<>::set<>() properly initialized
> the boolean to true:
>
> struct A : postponed< typelist typelist > > > >
> {
> };
[...]
The tuple<> like interface w
