[boost] Re: proposal for efficient geom. vector class

2003-06-04 Thread Patrick Kowalzick
Hello Justinas, I don't know where to upload this piece of code currently so I beg you pardon for sending an attachment. BTW, it is by no means a final implementation of things I've just written above. It's just an initial piece of code - constructive comments, etc. would be nice :) This

[boost] Re: proposal for efficient geom. vector class

2003-05-22 Thread Patrick Kowalzick
Hi Justinas, do you mean something like this? Please regard code below. Using the second parameter of the template arguments to define the size of a vector, so that you can call specialized functions for the right dimension? Greets, Patrick // ***

[boost] Re: proposal for efficient geom. vector class

2003-05-22 Thread Jaap Suter
It should save some work to define these objects in terms of geometric algebra. While I fully agree with this, you might find you'll have a hard time convincing other people of this. Many people are so locked into the traditional concepts of linear algebra that a geometric library without