Juanma Barranquero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:51:27 -0400
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see what that has to do with the contradiction I quoted.
First they say that GCCs newer than 2.95.x will be slower, then later
they say that the fastest GCC they
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:03:36 -0400
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that's self contradictory!
Not really. A bit later it says:
On all x86 compatibles (Celeron, PIII, P4, Athlon, etc) you need gcc
2.95.x or earlier, or gcc 3.1 or newer.
WRT best optimizer
Also, I'm strongly
Juanma Barranquero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:03:36 -0400
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that's self contradictory!
Not really. A bit later it says:
On all x86 compatibles (Celeron, PIII, P4, Athlon, etc) you need gcc
2.95.x or earlier, or gcc 3.1 or
David Abrahams wrote:
Juanma Barranquero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:03:36 -0400
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that's self contradictory!
Not really. A bit later it says:
On all x86 compatibles (Celeron, PIII, P4, Athlon, etc) you need gcc
2.95.x or
David Abrahams wrote:
Kirill Lapshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Atlas docs mentioned that it is possible to build atlas with msvc, but
no build procedure available, so it is tricky; also resulting library
going to be slower then one built with cygwin.
Really? MSVC's optimizer is generally better
David Abrahams wrote:
Can that binding be used on Win32 (other than through cygwin)?
Yes. You have to build atlas in CygWin, but after that you can link it
with msvc.
Can you point me to a procedure? AFAIK CygWin libs are a different
format (?)
Yep, that was quite a surprise for me too.
Here is
Kresimir Fresl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Kirill Lapshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Atlas docs mentioned that it is possible to build atlas with msvc, but
no build procedure available, so it is tricky; also resulting library
going to be slower then one built with cygwin.
A quick last minute contribution to this thread.
There was a fair bit of incidental information in the discussion. If
anyone wants to formalise things a little further one good place to put
is the Boost Wiki. There is already a page there regarding uBLAS and a
page on uBLAS and Linear Algebra
Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A quick last minute contribution to this thread.
There was a fair bit of incidental information in the discussion. If
anyone wants to formalise things a little further one good place to put
is the Boost Wiki. There is already a page there regarding
David Abrahams wrote:
Most of these are well covered by the current set of uBLAS binding to
Atlas.
Can that binding be used on Win32 (other than through cygwin)?
Yes. You have to build atlas in CygWin, but after that you can link it
with msvc.
Atlas docs mentioned that it is possible to build
- Original Message -
From: Kirill Lapshin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:59 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: uBlas and linear algebra questions
David Abrahams wrote:
Ah, I understand. It seems as though the choices for linear algebra
in C++ haven't
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:25 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: uBlas and linear algebra questions
Kirill Lapshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
I'm trying to get a grip on what facilities
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:51 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: uBlas and linear algebra questions
Kirill Lapshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Ah, I understand. It seems as though
13 matches
Mail list logo
