Pavol Droba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this possible? Or is there a way how to achieve the same efect,
> but without including ?
>
> I see, that is probably isn't ..
Correct, it is not.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
___
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:09:40AM -0500, David Abrahams wrote:
> Pavol Droba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have tried to make forward declaration of std::vector and alike, but it does not
> > work all the time,
> > and, I think it is even forbiden by some compilers.
>
> It's forbidden by
Pavol Droba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have tried to make forward declaration of std::vector and alike, but it does not
> work all the time,
> and, I think it is even forbiden by some compilers.
It's forbidden by the standard.
> My question is:
> Is there a correct way how to avoid
Hi Bootsters,
I have a problem that, I think, is worth of discussion.
When developing a library I came to a to a need of a trait class, containing properties
of different containers.
There is a default behavior and a specialization for different stl containers like
vector,
basic_string and etc.
