to add this ?
Thanks,
Viv
- Original Message -
From: William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] VC7/Threads Warnings
David Abrahams said:
William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams said
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Dimov
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:58 PM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: Re: [boost] VC7/Threads Warnings
Paul A. Bristow wrote:
I was surprised to find that /Wp64 flag (detect 64-bit portability)
means
- Original Message -
From: William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vc said:
As for the warnings themselves... I'm still doing more research just
to be 100% sure, but everything I've found thus far indicates you can
ignore these warnings as long as you link against the same RTL in
Paul A. Bristow said:
I was surprised to find that /Wp64 flag (detect 64-bit portability)
means that std::size_t is 64 bit. This leds to a number of oddities
that confused me. Is this perhaps causing your problem?
AFAIK and AFAICT, /Wp64 is not used.
--
William E. Kempf
vc said:
- Original Message -
From: William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vc said:
As for the warnings themselves... I'm still doing more research
just to be 100% sure, but everything I've found thus far indicates
you can ignore these warnings as long as you link against the same
Peter Dimov said:
William E. Kempf wrote:
I guess I'm wondering if the official toolsets shouldn't be changed. I
don't understand why the MSDN indicates it should default to /W2 while
we're seeing it default to what I assume is /W1. But, projects
created by the IDE default to /W3 (which is
- Original Message -
From: William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing so, the boost.thread will be build with the /MTd flag (for debug).
This is exactly
what you said that it won't be a good idea, right? Or am I missing
something here?
Sorry, I guess I wasn't very clear (and it
William E. Kempf wrote:
Peter Dimov said:
I agree with the suggestion. The default should be /W3 for VC 6, and
/W4 (possibly with some specific warnings disabled) on VC 7+.
Why /W4 for VC 7+? The IDE's default is still /W3 on these
compilers. I don't think selecting a level different from
Peter Dimov said:
William E. Kempf wrote:
Peter Dimov said:
I agree with the suggestion. The default should be /W3 for VC 6, and
/W4 (possibly with some specific warnings disabled) on VC 7+.
Why /W4 for VC 7+? The IDE's default is still /W3 on these
compilers. I don't think selecting a
vc said:
- Original Message -
From: William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing so, the boost.thread will be build with the /MTd flag (for
debug). This is exactly
what you said that it won't be a good idea, right? Or am I missing
something here?
Sorry, I guess I wasn't very clear
Andrew J. P. Maclean said:
I am using Boost Ver 1.30 just released. I built the libraries with
BJam. Now when building my code I get lots of warnings like the
following. These warnings worry me a bit because they are level 1 and 2
warnings. Is it safe to ignore these or do I need to manually
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] VC7/Threads Warnings
Andrew J. P. Maclean said:
I am using Boost Ver 1.30 just released. I built the libraries with
BJam. Now when building my code I get lots of warnings like the
following
David Abrahams said:
William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams said:
William E. Kempf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm... this surprised me. Mr. Maclean indicated the warnings were
level 1 _and_ 2. Builds with bjam do report errors, so the warning
level can't be 0. MSDN
02 04
Mobile mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of vc
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:20 PM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: Re: [boost] VC7/Threads Warnings
- Original Message
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [boost] VC7/Threads Warnings
vc said:
As I am having the same problem, I looked a little to the bjam
settings,
and it seems that, at least when building with VC7.x, the -Wx (warning
level) option is
not set, that is why probably with bjam these warnings are not seen
15 matches
Mail list logo
