> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:06 PM
> To: Boost mailing list
> Subject: RE: Re: Re: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
>
>
> --- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PR
E. Gladyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know much about other GUI systems but win32
> and MFC. I think we can try to define the low-level
> layer using win32 and/or MFC as the starting point.
Please, do NOT use MFC. Just native Win32 API as a starting point. MFC
is 1) not available on m
- Original Message -
From: "Brock Peabody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do you think we will be OK restricting this library to the more
> conformant compilers?
That should be fine. Compiler workarounds can often be added later, and you
shouldn't need to worry about these from the start. In fact,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Bronek Kozicki
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:06 AM
> To: Boost mailing list
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
>
> E. Gladyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
--- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> That might be a better way to go. I just don't know
> enough about GUI
> systems other than MFC to be able to envision what a
> scheme like that
> would look like or if it would succeed. You might
> save a lot of work
> coming up with a single low-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 2:33 PM
> To: Boost mailing list
> Subject: RE: Re: Re: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
>
>
> --- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PR
--- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This saves us from having to find a representational
> scheme that will
> fit on top of an unknown number of platforms which
> might not have
> anything in common.
>
I think this is where we disagree. I prefer to find a
single low-level represnt
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:03 PM
> To: Boost mailing list
> Subject: RE: Re: Re: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
>
>
> --- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL
--- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If we can keep our interface simple
> it might be easiest
> to just make the library an interface specification
> which is implemented
> totally independently for each target platform. Does
> that seem
> reasonable?
I agree.
I think we can have 2 la
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:29 AM
> To: Boost mailing list
> Subject: RE: Re: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
>
>
> --- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PRO
--- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/
>
> The name is boost_gui.zip. There is a ton of code,
> but the interface
I think, your library has a lot of good stuff. However
it does need a major redesign to cleanly remove all
direct references to
11 matches
Mail list logo
