- Original Message -
From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
> I mean that if a metafunction is a template instead of a type you
> can't treat it polymorphically with other things, e.g. you can't put
> it in a type sequence.
Yes, you can with the appropriate binders. That is what
"Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>
>>
>> AFAICT from browsing it quickly, the significance of TTP in your code
>> is that you are passing templates instead of types as functions in the
>> interfaces to you
- Original Message -
From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> AFAICT from browsing it quickly, the significance of TTP in your code
> is that you are passing templates instead of types as functions in the
> interfaces to your metafunctions, which I think is inadvisable,
> because
"Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> "Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Which could be even shorter yet if we could get away with template
>> > template parameters.
>>
>> We can and do.
>>
- Original Message -
From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Which could be even shorter yet if we could get away with template
> > template parameters.
>
> We can and do.
>
> How would you imagine it would be spelled with TTP?
You
>From: "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 000901c2b823$1e7f4aa0$8c00a8c0@c161550b">news:000901c2b823$1e7f4aa0$8c00a8c0@c161550b...
> From: "Terje Slettebø" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > [...]
> > BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT((\
> > boost::is_same::v
- Original Message -
From: "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:16 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Re: How to do this in
withboost--assert(typeid(T)==typeid(bool) )
> "Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 000901c2b823$1
"Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which could be even shorter yet if we could get away with template
> template parameters.
We can and do.
How would you imagine it would be spelled with TTP?
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consul