At 07:02 PM 8/10/2003, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
More seriously, did you have a chance to test GCC-3.3.1?
I just tested 3.3.1 on Windows, and the 7 ublas tests which had been
failing on 3.3 are now passing. The variant libraries variant_test4 is also
now passing.
The current plan is to use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Walter) writes:
[...]
| This whole thing (-fabi-version) is messy. It is what one gets by
| taking users for beta testers ;-)
|
| That's not the whole story. When testing with GCC 3.3.1 prerelease I noticed
| that setting -fabi-version isn't necessary anymore. So I
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| At 07:02 PM 8/10/2003, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| More seriously, did you have a chance to test GCC-3.3.1?
|
| I just tested 3.3.1 on Windows, and the 7 ublas tests which had been
| failing on 3.3 are now passing. The variant libraries variant_test4 is
Beman Dawes wrote:
(I still haven't gotten over Microsoft being the
first compiler to pass 100%. The world takes some strange twists
sometimes.)
Well, it's not like this happened by an accident, is it? It's been
explicitly stated that they are committed to this goal, and they made it
- Original Message -
From: Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: ublas and gcc (was: Re: [boost] Re: Compiler status for GCC
3.3)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Walter) writes:
[...]
| This whole
Hi Gabriel,
you wrote:
| On the other hand if your native compiler is GCC and your system
was
| not configured with that setting, then you may get into trouble --
| since you'll be mixing translation units with different ABIs.
|
| Furthermore, that sounds like a workaround. Isn't
