Re: [Boston.pm] Komodo vs. emacs

2003-07-01 Thread Erik Price
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 01:01 PM, David Cantrell wrote: The way I want to edit - and the way emacs doesn't want to let me edit - is for the editor to not impose any indentation at all. Rather, it should let me indent and then should automatically indent following lines by the same

Re: [Boston.pm] Komodo vs. emacs

2003-07-01 Thread Ronald J Kimball
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:01:05PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > On Tuesday, July 1, 2003 9:03 -0400 Joel Gwynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >From: David Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>It's a question of what you're used to, I guess. IMO emacs's > >>indentation blows syphilitic goats

RE: [Boston.pm] Komodo vs. emacs

2003-07-01 Thread David Cantrell
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003 9:03 -0400 Joel Gwynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: David Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a question of what you're used to, I guess. IMO emacs's indentation blows syphilitic goats :-) What exactly is wrong with emacs's auto-indent? It does what - IMO - is the

Re: [Boston.pm] Komodo vs. emacs

2003-07-01 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Komodo's code-folding is cool. I installed a code-folding script in > emacs (http://mah.everybody.org/docs/emacs/folding-cperl-mode), but > it wasn't as flexible as Komodo's code-folding; it only folded > top-level subroutines, whereas Komodo allows