[Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server? - a possible answer!

2004-12-07 Thread Ranga Nathan
I found that we already have a Mandrake box running Postfix. With the reviews I had from this list, it seems to be a reasonably good choice. Thank you all. __ Ranga Nathan / CSG Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services; BAX Global Inc.

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-03 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 02:00:02 -0500 . . . Postfix had all the features I was looking for right out of the box. It installs easily on a generic Linux platform; is familiar for someone used to Sendmail; has a fairly logical configuration

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-03 Thread Ted Zlatanov
>From experience (2000+ users, lots of research) I would recommend either qmail-ldap or Postfix for mail delivery (MTA) and Courier IMAP for IMAP and POP service. LDAP is essential if you plan to run a serious mail server. There's very few alternatives to a well-managed LDAP server for your user

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-03 Thread Sean Quinlan
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 19:48, Ranga Nathan wrote: > I am strongly advocating someone to get off Microsoft Exchange and move to > a Linux based mail server. I have used Sendmail but I find it a bit > complex . There has been more than enough discussion about options for replacing Exchange as

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-03 Thread Federico Lucifredi
Hello, > > To round out the virtual user solution I implemented, I used MySQL for > > the back-end database, Dovecot (http://www.dovecot.org/) for IMAP server > > (I'd recommend avoiding POP3 if you can), and maildrop > > (http://www.courier-mta.org/maildrop/) as the local delivery agent. > >

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 4:48 PM -0800 12/2/04, Ranga Nathan wrote: I am strongly advocating someone to get off Microsoft Exchange and move to a Linux based mail server. I have used Sendmail but I find it a bit complex . You've gotten recommendations for an SMTP server, which is good, but only part of the stuff you

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-03 Thread Anthony R. J. Ball
> To round out the virtual user solution I implemented, I used MySQL for > the back-end database, Dovecot (http://www.dovecot.org/) for IMAP server > (I'd recommend avoiding POP3 if you can), and maildrop > (http://www.courier-mta.org/maildrop/) as the local delivery agent. > Though I'm not

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-03 Thread David Cantrell
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:48:03PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote: > I am strongly advocating someone to get off Microsoft Exchange and move to > a Linux based mail server. I have used Sendmail but I find it a bit > complex . > > Looking at this Qmail seems OK to me. But I believe there are some

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-02 Thread Anthony R. J. Ball
I really like qmail... and combined with qpsmtpd I have stopped over 90 percent of my incoming crap at the smtpd level. On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:48:03PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote: > I am strongly advocating someone to get off Microsoft Exchange and move to > a Linux based mail server. I

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-02 Thread Tom Metro
Ranga Nathan wrote: I am strongly advocating someone to get off Microsoft Exchange and move to a Linux based mail server. I think the two easy answers are: 1. Use whatever is bundled with your Linux distribution. If it is for a small site, and they don't require anything beyond the basic

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-02 Thread Ian Langworth
On 02.Dec.2004 04:48PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote: > I am strongly advocating someone to get off Microsoft Exchange > and move to a Linux based mail server. I found the previous responses interesting. Nobody mentioned Postfix or Exim. Postfix is still my personal favorite. It's what I install

[Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-02 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Ranga Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:48:03 -0800 I am strongly advocating someone to get off Microsoft Exchange and move to a Linux based mail server. I have used Sendmail but I find it a bit complex. I chose qmail for my home system because I refused to

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-02 Thread James Eshelman
to get on Linux without a lot of hassle and setup time. - Original Message - From: "Ranga Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 7:48 PM Subject: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server? > I am strongly advo

Re: [Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-02 Thread User Reichert
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:48:03PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote: > I am strongly advocating someone to get off Microsoft Exchange and move to > a Linux based mail server. I have used Sendmail but I find it a bit > complex . > I found this link: > http://www.geocities.com/mailsoftware42/ > >

[Boston.pm] OT: Recommendation for mail server?

2004-12-02 Thread Ranga Nathan
I am strongly advocating someone to get off Microsoft Exchange and move to a Linux based mail server. I have used Sendmail but I find it a bit complex . I found this link: http://www.geocities.com/mailsoftware42/ Looking at this Qmail seems OK to me. But I believe there are some perl based