Jesse Vincent wrote:
[I'm] generally seeing pushback only from folks who'd rather RT be
written in Python...
I'd be curious to know what reasons they state for that, if they've
bothered to explain.
-Tom
___
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.pm.org
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 01:16:36AM -0500, Tom Metro wrote:
> Adam Turoff wrote:
> >Tom Metro wrote:
> >>Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>Hmmm...isn't that sort of what were talking about? If there's no job
> >>market for Perl, that's kinda hard to do. Even if you run a
Aaron Sherman wrote:
CPAN continues to be one of the most useful resources on the planet.
That requires a HUGE user-base, but there's plenty of room for the Javas
and the Rubys and the Pythons and the C#s of the world.
Someone commented recently on the london-ruby list that
they wish more
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 01:16 -0500, Tom Metro wrote:
> I'd be willing to bet that Jesse has encountered, with some regularity,
> resistance to commercial adoption of RT due to its use of Perl.
Ah... hey, I'm a fan of RT overall, but lack of commercial adoption
would be a result of the fact that
Adam Turoff wrote:
Tom Metro wrote:
Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If Perl per se matters to you that much, then you should find some way
to make it your day job.
Hmmm...isn't that sort of what were talking about? If there's no job
market for Perl, that's kinda hard to do. Even if you run
5 matches
Mail list logo
