On 9/12/07, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 9/11/07, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>From: "Ben Tilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
>That said, know your audience. Using functional techniques in Perl
>should be a deliberate decision. In many programming groups,
From: "Ben Tilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:40:40 -0700
On 9/11/07, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Ben Tilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:18:57 -0700
>
>On 9/11/07, Palit, Nilanjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/11/07, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Ben Tilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:18:57 -0700
>
>On 9/11/07, Palit, Nilanjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
>> > It is very bad form to use map as a looping construct.
>>
>> Can you elab
> Am I reading this right? Are you actually defending the lowest common
> denominator of language design? The paragraph above
Not language design but coding in an appropriate subset.
English and Perl are both special because TIMTOWTDI.
My personal toolkit at the office is a more HOPish sty
From: "Ben Tilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:18:57 -0700
On 9/11/07, Palit, Nilanjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > It is very bad form to use map as a looping construct.
>
> Can you elaborate why it is a bad form: readability, performance, ...?
> J
On 9/11/07, Palit, Nilanjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > It is very bad form to use map as a looping construct.
>
> Can you elaborate why it is a bad form: readability, performance, ...?
> Just want to understand the underlying reason. (To me, both the for &
> map inline forms appear to be
ine forms appear to be the same readability & performance wise.)
Thanks,
-Nilanjan
-Original Message-
From: Ben Tilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:52 PM
To: Palit, Nilanjan
Cc: boston-pm@mail.pm.org
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Subroutine definition
On 9/1
On 9/11/07, Palit, Nilanjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I tried this using the following code, where %format_conv has an
> entry for each type of conversion needed with a list of items:
[...]
> When I run it, the 'defined' part works fine, but I get an error on the
> last line:
>
> Can't use st
uot; in use at bsdl_gen.pl line 238.
How do I get this sub call to work with the sub name in a variable?
Thanks,
-Nilanjan
-Original Message-
From: Ronald J Kimball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:01 PM
To: Palit, Nilanjan
Cc: boston-pm@mail.pm.org
Subject: Re: [
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:00:30 -0400 Ronald J Kimball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RJK> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0700, Palit, Nilanjan wrote:
>> I have to do some format conversions, so I'm defining subroutines like
>> "sub FormatConv_X2Y()"
...
RJK> Other options include:
RJK> Creating
Ronald,
Thanks, that works great!
-Nilanjan
-Original Message-
From: Ronald J Kimball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:01 PM
To: Palit, Nilanjan
Cc: boston-pm@mail.pm.org
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Subroutine definition
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:51:56AM
On Monday 10 September 2007, Palit, Nilanjan wrote:
> I have to do some format conversions, so I'm defining subroutines like
> "sub FormatConv_X2Y()". At this point I have only a few of the format
> conversions defined & I haven't gone through the entire dataset to know
> all the format conversions
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0700, Palit, Nilanjan wrote:
> I have to do some format conversions, so I'm defining subroutines like
> "sub FormatConv_X2Y()". At this point I have only a few of the format
> conversions defined & I haven't gone through the entire dataset to know
> all the forma
I have to do some format conversions, so I'm defining subroutines like
"sub FormatConv_X2Y()". At this point I have only a few of the format
conversions defined & I haven't gone through the entire dataset to know
all the format conversions needed. So I'd like to check whether a
specific format conv
14 matches
Mail list logo