> "BR" == Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BR> As machines get faster and ease of cross-platform installation gets more
BR> important, I expect the need for C-level hackery will go down. I
BR> suspect this is overused even at present. Several years ago, I wound up
BR>
From: Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:45:21 -0500
Sean Quinlan wrote:
> ...Parrot will be able to save and reuse it's bytecode,
> which might give you something close to a platform specific executable...
Wasn't the objective a non-platform specific way
> Surprisingly Active State maintains a Perl distribution for (RedHat)
> Linux (or at least they did), and I believe a repository of PPMs as
well.
And also Solaris and IBM AIX. I think the Linux Perl build and PPMs are
likely to run on any reasonably normal Intel Linux, but not sure -- with
the
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 15:46 -0500, Duane Bronson wrote:
> CPAN bundles:
> Aren't CPAN bundles always source distributions? PPM is actually
> better than CPAN because it's a pre-built distribution, except that it
> only works with Windows (I think) and if a build fails, the last working
>
4 matches
Mail list logo