RE: [Boston.pm] Hi all - a meta refresh question

2003-04-01 Thread Ranga Nathan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:        "Ranga Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         Subject:        RE: [Boston.pm] Hi all - a meta refresh question > Please correct me if I'm wrong... but I read somewhere out there that > server push headers o

RE: [Boston.pm] Hi all - a meta refresh question

2003-03-29 Thread Wizard
> Please correct me if I'm wrong... but I read somewhere out there that > server push headers only work with Netscape and not much else. That may be. As I said, I haven't used one in quite a few years. Grant M. ___ Boston-pm mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Boston.pm] Hi all - a meta refresh question

2003-03-29 Thread James Linden Rose, III
Please correct me if I'm wrong... but I read somewhere out there that server push headers only work with Netscape and not much else. James On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 07:12 AM, Wizard wrote: A meta refresh will be difficult to do because the connection isn't persistent. A meta refresh

RE: [Boston.pm] Hi all - a meta refresh question

2003-03-29 Thread Wizard
A meta refresh will be difficult to do because the connection isn't persistent. A meta refresh will only restart the script every time it requests the script again. The only way that I can see this working is to use what is known as "server-push". This is done using the Content-type:

Re: [Boston.pm] Hi all - a meta refresh question

2003-03-28 Thread Evan A. Zacks
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:43:44PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote: >I have a small CGI problem that someone else would have solved, >perhaps easily! I want to return a progress message ('please wait..') >before returning the actual output, which could take a few seconds. >How would I