Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:47:06 +0100 you wrote:
> Ido Schimmel writes:
>
> This patchset adds 802.1X [1] and MAB [2] offload support in mlxsw.
>
> Patches #1-#3 add the required switchdev interfaces.
>
> Patches
On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 19:25:32 +
Ali Shirvani wrote:
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Wednesday, November 9th, 2022 at 8:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
>
>
> > On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 10:51:27 +
> > Ali Shirvani via Bridge
On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 19:25:32 +
Ali Shirvani wrote:
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Wednesday, November 9th, 2022 at 8:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
>
>
> > On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 10:51:27 +
> > Ali Shirvani via Bridge
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, November 9th, 2022 at 8:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 10:51:27 +
> Ali Shirvani via Bridge bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > It seems we
On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 10:51:27 +
Ali Shirvani via Bridge wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It seems we reach the Linux bridge limitation on the number of interfaces in
> a single bridge. Currently, we have 210 tap interface in a bridge, and we
> suffer from more than 50% packet loss when we ping
Hello everyone,
It seems we reach the Linux bridge limitation on the number of interfaces in a
single bridge. Currently, we have 210 tap interface in a bridge, and we suffer
from more than 50% packet loss when we ping the IP address of the virtual
machine that uses one of the tap interfaces in
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:59:29PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Can't really figure out from the patch, sorry. Port security works with
> > LAG offload?
>
> Yes. It's just that port security needs to be enabled on each of the
>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:59:29PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Can't really figure out from the patch, sorry. Port security works with
> LAG offload?
Yes. It's just that port security needs to be enabled on each of the
member ports. FDB entries that point to a LAG are programmed with a