Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Add 802.1X and MAB offload support

2022-11-09 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master) by Jakub Kicinski : On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:47:06 +0100 you wrote: > Ido Schimmel writes: > > This patchset adds 802.1X [1] and MAB [2] offload support in mlxsw. > > Patches #1-#3 add the required switchdev interfaces. > > Patches

Re: [Bridge] How to connect more than 200 interfaces to a bridge

2022-11-09 Thread Stephen Hemminger via Bridge
On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 19:25:32 + Ali Shirvani wrote: > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > --- Original Message --- > On Wednesday, November 9th, 2022 at 8:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 10:51:27 + > > Ali Shirvani via Bridge

Re: [Bridge] How to connect more than 200 interfaces to a bridge

2022-11-09 Thread Stephen Hemminger via Bridge
On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 19:25:32 + Ali Shirvani wrote: > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > --- Original Message --- > On Wednesday, November 9th, 2022 at 8:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 10:51:27 + > > Ali Shirvani via Bridge

Re: [Bridge] How to connect more than 200 interfaces to a bridge

2022-11-09 Thread Ali Shirvani via Bridge
Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Wednesday, November 9th, 2022 at 8:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 10:51:27 + > Ali Shirvani via Bridge bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > It seems we

Re: [Bridge] How to connect more than 200 interfaces to a bridge

2022-11-09 Thread Stephen Hemminger via Bridge
On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 10:51:27 + Ali Shirvani via Bridge wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It seems we reach the Linux bridge limitation on the number of interfaces in > a single bridge. Currently, we have 210 tap interface in a bridge, and we > suffer from more than 50% packet loss when we ping

[Bridge] How to connect more than 200 interfaces to a bridge

2022-11-09 Thread Ali Shirvani via Bridge
Hello everyone, It seems we reach the Linux bridge limitation on the number of interfaces in a single bridge. Currently, we have 210 tap interface in a bridge, and we suffer from more than 50% packet loss when we ping the IP address of the virtual machine that uses one of the tap interfaces in

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 11/15] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Add locked bridge port support

2022-11-09 Thread Vladimir Oltean
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:59:29PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > Can't really figure out from the patch, sorry. Port security works with > > LAG offload? > > Yes. It's just that port security needs to be enabled on each of the >

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 11/15] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Add locked bridge port support

2022-11-09 Thread Ido Schimmel via Bridge
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:59:29PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > Can't really figure out from the patch, sorry. Port security works with > LAG offload? Yes. It's just that port security needs to be enabled on each of the member ports. FDB entries that point to a LAG are programmed with a