Gautam wrote:
By the way, Pedro looked good in his first start for
the mets.
Yes, he looked excellent. Let's just hope that he's
rehabbed his shoulder properly.
Hey, hey, hey, how about that Kirk Saarloos one hitting your Orioles
tonight!
Thank goodness for baseball season. Go A's!
--
Doug
_
Russell Chapman wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
if I'm to believe all the comments of people who have gone to every
Burning Man event since at least 2001. (And the resolution available
for right there is a lot better than for the nearest real town, or so
I've been told.)
That's because the geeks
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: The Other Christianity (was Re: Babble theory, and comments)
>
> Haven't read the book - nothing I saw about him
> suggested even vaguely it
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, Pedro looked good in his first start for
the mets.
Yes, he looked excellent. Let's just hope that he's
rehabbed his shoulder properly.
Just for the record, I'm not happy about this.
I hate the Mets.
Nothing personal, just the 1986 Wo
I suppose it depends some on how the words are defined, but;
If it happens, its real. If its real, it must be natural. There cant be
anything beyond the boundary of it happens except for it cant happen or
it doesnt happen. Starting with that sort of definition, there is no
supernat
--- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, hey, hey, how about that Kirk Saarloos one
> hitting your Orioles
> tonight!
>
> Thank goodness for baseball season. Go A's!
>
> --
> Doug
Gee, thanks Doug (:-)), I didn't know that until I
read it on list :-( This is my first day reading t
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: New Pope?
> Dan wrote:
>
> > there is no empirical evidence for human rights.
>
> I'll bet a nickle you could prove that human rights provide
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 09:44 PM Wednesday 4/6/2005, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>> Julia Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>> I can always hope, can't I? :)
>>>
>>> Julia
>>>
>> I was thinking much the same thing before I went to
>> http://www.nice-tits.org/
>>
>> Was I wrong for that?
>>
>>
>>
>> xponent
>
Gautam wrote:
Gee, thanks Doug (:-)), I didn't know that until I
read it on list :-( This is my first day reading the
list in weeks - I'm so overloaded with work this is
kind of my despairing gesture at ever getting it
finished...
Yea, I'm busy too, but I'm easily distracted. Especially when I ca
On Apr 6, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Because DDT thins birds' egg shells. The biggest reason bald eagles
are
endangered is DDT -- it thinned the birds' shells so drastically that
many embryos never survived to full
On Apr 6, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Warren Ockrassa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because DDT thins birds' egg shells. The biggest
reason bald eagles are
endangered is DDT -- it thinned the birds' shells so
drastically that
many embryos never survived to full development.
Is that a s
On Apr 6, 2005, at 2:42 PM, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Apr 3, 2005, at 9:09 PM, Dan Minette wrote:
From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pffft. Developing implies some sort of progress. We're
backsliding.
Out of curiosit
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
