Bemmzim wrote:
Cats are a perfect example of non-domestication. We have certainly
bred them to be smaller and tamer but they are not domesticated in
the way that dogs are domesticated. They do not connect with humans
in the same way.
I may be among the few humans who like _both_ cats
On 4/18/06, Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be among the few humans who like _both_ cats and dogs.
I admire dogs because they are loyal and trustful, and I admire
cats for their independence and irreverence.
We had cats and a dog when I was a kid.. and I have had cats as an
On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Robert J. Chassell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
In the relevant manner, how do domesticated animals differ from
hunted
animals? (I know they differ; the question is how?) Deborah Harrell,
can you comment?
snip^2
In one sentence:
On Apr 18, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
I may be among the few humans who like _both_ cats and dogs.
I admire dogs because they are loyal and trustful, and I admire
cats for their independence and irreverence.
Allow me to affirm your open-mindedness w/r/t cats and dogs.
I think
On 4/18/06, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: There are 2.45M pages for introvert on Google, but only 2.0M
pages for extrovert. Wonder what that means?
It means you probably should have searched on extravert.
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
On 18 Apr 2006, at 7:21PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 4/18/06, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: There are 2.45M pages for introvert on Google, but only 2.0M
pages for extrovert. Wonder what that means?
It means you probably should have searched on extravert.
That variant
Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 08:14 PM Monday 4/17/2006, Deborah Harrell
wrote:
snip
Animals suitable to be domesticated must, in
general,
have a native hierarchy, which humans can then
utilize
to their own advantage... in carnivores, a
relatively stable
pack or strong
--text follows this line--
Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
Animals suitable to be domesticated must, in general, have a
native hierarchy ...
That is extemely interesting. For whatever reason, I never thought of
it.
In one sentence: domesticated animals were bred from
Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
snip
Maybe I have the wrong title, but it's definitely
a KL
song on the High Adventure album;
My bad. It's actually titled 'Welcome To Heartlight.
I like the love
And I like the peaceful
I wish everyone I know could
Robert J. Chassell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
Animals suitable to be domesticated must, in
general, have a native hierarchy ...
That is extemely interesting. For whatever reason,
I never thought of it.
Well, it's not exactly my original thinking;
At 09:00 PM Monday 4/17/2006, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: three paradigm shifts?
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:54:34 -0500
At 08:14 PM Monday 4/17/2006,
On 18/04/2006, at 11:59 PM, Deborah Harrell wrote:
That is extemely interesting. For whatever reason,
I never thought of it.
Well, it's not exactly my original thinking; 'be the
leader' is the big theme in current horsemanship
training, and has been important in dog training for a
while.
Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snippage
Was Judas a villain?
I don't think so myself. If one believes that Christ
was divine and
that God has a plan then Judas was just a part of
the plan and cannot
be faulted for advancing the sacrifice. Indeed,
advancing the
On 19/04/2006, at 12:53 AM, Deborah Harrell wrote:
But I have
problems with the 'planned betrayal,' as this makes
Judas a stool pigeon, and God an underhanded schemer.
Indeed, it brings to mind the entire Garden bit as
another planned betrayal.
Precisely. It's yet more of why this loving
On Apr 18, 2006, at 12:05 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 18 Apr 2006, at 7:21PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 4/18/06, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: There are 2.45M pages for introvert on Google, but only 2.0M
pages for extrovert. Wonder what that means?
It means you probably
On 4/18/06, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Where are the missing 420,000 extr*verts? Land
Apparently there was a party and we weren't invited. Well, you weren't.
I'm an intravert.
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
Nick
On Apr 18, 2006, at 4:00 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 4/18/06, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Where are the missing 420,000 extr*verts? Land
Apparently there was a party and we weren't invited. Well, you
weren't.
I'm an intravert.
You are? How odd. Google only has 13,500
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 19/04/2006, at 12:53 AM, Deborah Harrell wrote:
But I have
problems with the 'planned betrayal,' as this makes
Judas a stool pigeon, and God an underhanded schemer.
Indeed, it brings to mind the entire Garden bit as
another planned betrayal.
Precisely. It's yet more
On 19 Apr 2006, at 12:56AM, Max Battcher wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 19/04/2006, at 12:53 AM, Deborah Harrell wrote:
But I have
problems with the 'planned betrayal,' as this makes
Judas a stool pigeon, and God an underhanded schemer.
Indeed, it brings to mind the entire Garden bit as
http://goodmath.blogspot.com/
He welcomes clarifications and corrections.
I'm enjoying it.
Oh, and he posted this link:
http://www.math.northwestern.edu/%7Ematt/kleinfour/media/finite.wmv
earlier this week. That's a fun one, IMO. :)
Julia
- Original Message -
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: The Gospel Of Judas
Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snippage
Was Judas a villain?
I don't think so myself. If
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:13 PM
Subject: Blog of interest
http://goodmath.blogspot.com/
He welcomes clarifications and corrections.
I'm enjoying it.
Oh, and he posted
- Original Message -
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Blog of interest
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Robert Seeberger wrote:
In terms of morality and ethics *why* one chooses can be more
important than *what* one chooses.
Yuck! I know you state can be and not the absolute are, but you
still are positing that in some cases the ends justify the means and
worse the intent justify the means.
24 matches
Mail list logo
