Ronn! wrote:
> In any case, someone on the ground looked up and
> remarked, "It's December and there's a nip in the air . . . "
Let me ask you Ronn; if you had a funny play on the words "nigger" or
"kike" would you consider posting it to the list?
Doug
__
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'"
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: We Will Not Be Afraid
>
> I quoted the part that said it
>
>
> Alien unlawful enemy combatants may be
> tried for violations of the law of
On Oct 5, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 05/10/2006, at 9:19 PM, jdiebremse wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You really think that I think the Democrats are any better?
Hypocrites and liars on both sides.
You did leave me with that distinct
> Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wrote:
>
>
What the hay? This is the second time DEFANGED has
been inserted into one of my posts; I did not use any
foul language -- and when I have typed 'hell,' 'damn'
or such, it's gone through unchanged.
> > Well, I've got to go, so will
> Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> > Horn, John wrote:
> > > On Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
> > > these hypocrites, such as the Foley case, and
> even rabid
> > > rightists will see them for what they are:
> > >power-grabbing immoral elitists.
> >
> >They are politicians...what else would they be?
> Right
At 01:17 PM Friday 10/6/2006, Dan Minette wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Richard Baker
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 1:14 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: We Will Not Be Afraid
>
> DanM said:
>
> > The nature
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Richard Baker
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 1:14 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: We Will Not Be Afraid
>
> DanM said:
>
> > The nature of the attack was that it was made by folks hidi
DanM said:
The nature of the attack was that it was made by folks hiding among
the
general population, pretending to be engaged in lawful activities.
Contrast
this with Pearl Harbor, where the attackers were clearly members of
the air
force of Japan.
Weren't they members of the Imperial
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dan Minette
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:11 PM
> To: 'Killer Bs Discussion'
> Subject: RE: We Will Not Be Afraid
>
>
>
> > I am confused. What *was* the nature and scope of the attack, other
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ritu
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:14 AM
> To: 'Killer Bs Discussion'
> Subject: RE: We Will Not Be Afraid
>
> Dan Minette wrote;
>
> > But, the law _specifically_
> > addresses the treatment
Dan Minette wrote;
> But, the law _specifically_
> addresses the treatment of aliens, not citizens. So, by this
> law, I think the President could declare a citizen an
> "unlawful enemy combatant", but he clearly could not subject
> a citizen to these tribunals...because...by the definition
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Robert Seeberger
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:29 AM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: We Will Not Be Afraid
>
>
>
> I think this is an example of what Charlie is talking about when he
12 matches
Mail list logo
