RE: NASA Goes Deep

2007-02-26 Thread Dan Minette
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Seeberger Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 9:29 PM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: NASA Goes Deep It was and it wasn't, eh? I think we will agree that as it is advertized, the

Re: NASA Goes Deep

2007-02-26 Thread Max Battcher
On 2/25/07, Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would you feel differently if the manned program was doing something that was actually useful? If the program had set up permanent zeroG manufacturing lines making products that could only be made in space, would the bang for the buck

Re: NASA Goes Deep

2007-02-26 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 11:36 PM Sunday 2/25/2007, Max Battcher wrote: On 2/25/07, Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would you feel differently if the manned program was doing something that was actually useful? If the program had set up permanent zeroG manufacturing lines making products that could

Re: NASA Goes Deep

2007-02-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message: - From: Max Battcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:36:43 -0500 To: brin-l@mccmedia.com Subject: Re: NASA Goes Deep One of the results from our space program that we have seen is that yeast in low-gravity conditions generates better, more