RE: magic formula

2007-09-21 Thread Dan Minettte
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of jon louis mann > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 3:02 PM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: magic formula > >> Let me get this straight. You claim that there are revolutionary >> inventions, that

RE: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Dan Minettte
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of William T Goodall > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 8:25 PM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: Re: Netiquette > > > On 22 Sep 2007, at 01:32, Dan Minettte wrote: > > > > > I heard that the Stock

Re: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread William T Goodall
On 22 Sep 2007, at 01:32, Dan Minettte wrote: > > I heard that the Stockholm Peace Institute is underwriting a remake > of Kill > Bill I & II. It will be titled "Take A Chill Pill Bill I & 2." Rough > drafts of the script have Uma Thurman working out her issues > through group > therapy, ra

Re: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: "Charlie Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 7:13 PM Subject: Re: Netiquette > > On 22/09/2007, at 4:08 AM, Julia Thompson wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Horn, John wrote: >> Martin Lewis wrote >>>

Re: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: "Dan Minettte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 7:32 PM Subject: RE: Netiquette > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Charlie Bell >> Sent: Fr

RE: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Dan Minettte
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Charlie Bell > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 7:13 PM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: Re: Netiquette > > > On 22/09/2007, at 4:08 AM, Julia Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007,

Re: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Charlie Bell
On 22/09/2007, at 4:08 AM, Julia Thompson wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Horn, John wrote: > >>> Martin Lewis wrote >>> >>> I was using it in reference to this line: >>> >>> "Oh, for Krum's sake, Martin. Take a pill." >>> >>> I don't get the exact meaning but presumed you were >>> suggesting s

not so secret reasons for u.s.intervention

2007-09-21 Thread jon louis mann
> sorry, dan, that is a right wing myth!~) do you really think > everything the us spends of weapons is reported too the GAO, or > anywhere else for that matter? the illegal sales of billions of dollars worth of weapons involves a lot of logistics that would be essentially impossible to keep s

magic formula

2007-09-21 Thread jon louis mann
Let me get this straight. You claim that there are revolutionary inventions, that would allow us to economically obtain energy from, say, solar power, and they are well documented. Yet, none of the solar sites references the clearly established documentation for this invention...even though it is

Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread jon louis mann
I read that as "take a chill pill" which is a bit different. I didn't, initially, so I can understand someone not getting that immediately, or at all if it wasn't explained. I believe that is an American colloquialism, and one that isn't used in my own circles. i never heard of chill pill, but

Re: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Julia Thompson
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Dave Land wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Richard Baker wrote: > >> Nick said: >> >>> And, ipso facto, the sina qua non for this group. >>> >>> Semper fidelus, >> >> As we're all being so exact, that should be "sine" and "fidelis". > > Actually, how do we Nick was no

RE: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Julia Thompson
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Horn, John wrote: >> Martin Lewis wrote >> >> I was using it in reference to this line: >> >> "Oh, for Krum's sake, Martin. Take a pill." >> >> I don't get the exact meaning but presumed you were >> suggesting something about my mental state. > > I read that as "take a chill

Re: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Dave Land
On Sep 20, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Richard Baker wrote: > Nick said: > >> And, ipso facto, the sina qua non for this group. >> >> Semper fidelus, > > As we're all being so exact, that should be "sine" and "fidelis". Actually, how do we Nick was not making an oblique reference to the Society for Indece

RE: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Horn, John
> Martin Lewis wrote > > I was using it in reference to this line: > > "Oh, for Krum's sake, Martin. Take a pill." > > I don't get the exact meaning but presumed you were > suggesting something about my mental state. I read that as "take a chill pill" which is a bit different. - jmh CONFID

Re: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Martin Lewis
On 9/21/07, Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't get the exact meaning but presumed you were suggesting > > something about my mental state. In other words you were attacking my > > character rather than the argument. Is this not a perfect example of > > an ad hominem? > > No, becau

Re: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Charlie Bell
On 21/09/2007, at 6:31 PM, Martin Lewis wrote: > > I don't get the exact meaning but presumed you were suggesting > something about my mental state. In other words you were attacking my > character rather than the argument. Is this not a perfect example of > an ad hominem? No, because he wasn't

Re: Netiquette

2007-09-21 Thread Martin Lewis
On 9/20/07, Dave Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's not an ad hominem, that's just abuse. Ad hominem is when you > > argue that the person is wrong because of some character of that > > person, instead of engaging the argument. > > I think I sense a trend here: > > "Non-sequitur" used and