Re: Wal-Mart is evil, why it must be eradicated

2008-11-30 Thread John Williams
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:42 PM, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> What exactly do you mean when you say "free markets reliably regulate >> prices"? > > Exactly what I wrote. So, meaningless. Or so broad as to hav

RE: It's confirmed: Matter is merely vacuum fluctuations

2008-11-30 Thread Rceeberger
On 11/30/2008 5:30:23 PM, Dan M ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Rob wrote: > > > If physics were anything more than approximate, we would have final > > answers to all our questions. > > How? All physics does is model observations. Models make predictions. And over time models have made predictions

Re: Wal-Mart is evil, why it must be eradicated

2008-11-30 Thread Nick Arnett
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:42 PM, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > If free markets reliably regulate prices, > > What exactly do you mean when you say "free markets reliably regulate > prices"? Exactly what

Re: Wal-Mart is evil, why it must be eradicated

2008-11-30 Thread John Williams
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If free markets reliably regulate prices, What exactly do you mean when you say "free markets reliably regulate prices"? > Surely neither supply nor demand changed much in such a short > time. I don't think there was an

RE: It's confirmed: Matter is merely vacuum fluctuations

2008-11-30 Thread Dan M
Rob wrote: > If physics were anything more than approximate, we would have final > answers to all our questions. How? All physics does is model observations. Physics was created out of Natural Philosophy by tabling the question of the reliability of observations. Now, you can use the results o

Re: It's confirmed: Matter is merely vacuum fluctuations

2008-11-30 Thread Rceeberger
On 11/30/2008 2:26:19 AM, Ronn! Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > At 08:25 PM Saturday 11/29/2008, Bruce Bostwick wrote: > > >(Although to be fair, classical mechanics does sum up pretty well what > >we see on our scale. > It's just right for the wrong reasons, is all. :) > > > > Why is it

Re: It's confirmed: Matter is merely vacuum fluctuations

2008-11-30 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 08:25 PM Saturday 11/29/2008, Bruce Bostwick wrote: >(Although to be fair, classical mechanics does sum up pretty well what >we see on our scale. It's just right for the wrong reasons, is all. :) Why is it "for the wrong reasons"? Some would say that if it leads to predictions which match