"Ronn! Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 09:27 AM 1/22/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
> >What do you need beyond the brief description I gave John yesterday
> >morning? Particulars of the cat fight?
>
> What does wet cement have to do with it?
It ends with both young women falling into a container of
At 09:27 AM 1/22/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
"Ronn! Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 06:59 PM 1/20/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
> >"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
> > >
> > > At 10:48 PM 1/18/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> > > > Julia
> > > >
> > > >who doesn't like the end of a certain commer
"Ronn! Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 06:59 PM 1/20/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
> >"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
> > >
> > > At 10:48 PM 1/18/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> > > > Julia
> > > >
> > > >who doesn't like the end of a certain commercial
> > >
> > > As opposed to the beginning of i
At 06:59 PM 1/20/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> At 10:48 PM 1/18/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> > Julia
> >
> >who doesn't like the end of a certain commercial
>
> As opposed to the beginning of it?
The whole commercial leaves something to be desired, certa
"Horn, John" wrote:
> Could someone clue me in as to what commercial is being discussed here? I
> seem to have missed that part...
>
> Thanks. I think...
The lite beer commercial where the two attractive young women get into a cat
fight over whether or not it's "less filling" or "tastes great"
> From: Doug Pensinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> >Now, I have heard that there is an ending only seen on cable TV that
> >might push the limits even farther, but I have not seen it.
> >
> >As far as what the least objectionable thing in the
> commercial is, it's
> >the expressions of the gi
At 08:23 PM 1/20/2003 -0600, you wrote:
"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> At 06:59 PM 1/20/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> >The whole commercial leaves something to be desired, certainly (a sense
> >of decency?), but falling into the cement that way is *dangerous*, and
> >some idiot is going to end
Julia Thompson wrote:
Now, I have heard that there is an ending only seen on cable TV that
might push the limits even farther, but I have not seen it.
As far as what the least objectionable thing in the commercial is, it's
the expressions of the girlfriends as the guys are relating the fantasy.
"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> At 06:59 PM 1/20/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> >The whole commercial leaves something to be desired, certainly (a sense
> >of decency?), but falling into the cement that way is *dangerous*, and
> >some idiot is going to end up hurting herself (or himself?) trying
Julia Thompson wrote:
>The whole commercial leaves something to be desired, certainly (a
>sense of decency?), but falling into the cement that way is
>*dangerous*, and some idiot is going to end up hurting herself (or
>himself?) trying to emulate the whole thing.
>Leading up to that point, it's
At 06:59 PM 1/20/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
>The whole commercial leaves something to be desired, certainly (a sense
>of decency?), but falling into the cement that way is *dangerous*, and
>some idiot is going to end up hurting herself (or himself?) trying to
>emulate the whole thing.
Surely
"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> At 10:48 PM 1/18/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> > Julia
> >
> >who doesn't like the end of a certain commercial
>
> As opposed to the beginning of it?
The whole commercial leaves something to be desired, certainly (a sense
of decency?), but falling into the
At 10:48 PM 1/18/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> Julia
>
>who doesn't like the end of a certain commercial
As opposed to the beginning of it?
JDG
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
People everywhere want to sa
13 matches
Mail list logo
