At 07:12 PM 10/26/2004 -0700 David Brin wrote:
>b) Don't you deal with the bigger culprits first and
>in some proportion to their involvement?
Sometimes you deal with the problem you *can* deal with first, if two
problems are roughly similar in their seriousness. (BTW - I am not
agreeing with y
--- JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's up Nick - are you *really* going to try and
> defend the outlandish
> comment from Dr. Brin here that you snipped?
>
> --- David Brin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To call it "rational argument" when you
> deliberately> > tell falsehoods about other
At 06:45 AM 10/26/2004 -0700 Nick Arnett wrote:
>> You know, Dr. Brin, I challenged you on that ludicrous
>> statement, and you didn't back it up. It's pretty
>> obvious that you can't.
>
>There are other possible explanations...
What's up Nick - are you *really* going to try and defend the out
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
You know, Dr. Brin, I challenged you on that ludicrous
statement, and you didn't back it up. It's pretty
obvious that you can't.
There are other possible explanations...
Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
--- David Brin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To call it "rational argument" when you deliberately
> tell falsehoods about other peoples' views. Then
> use
> a DOZEN sophistries in just forty words
You know, Dr. Brin, I challenged you on that ludicrous
statement, and you didn't back it up. It'
--- Robert
your sentiments are generous. But the objectionable
parts of the following are not only the first part:
> "As for the opposite side...I am on the side of the
> United States of America. If you choose to be on
> the
> opposite side from me, that's your choice. I can
> say
> that at
