In a message dated 10/23/2004 1:42:00 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But he wasn't. His published figures are too good to be real:
they don't pass a Chi-Square test, meaning that he adjusted
them to look better than what he found in his experiments :-)
The notion tha
In a message dated 10/23/2004 10:42:00 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Baker wrote:
>
> Which is not to say that Mendel wasn't an excellent scientist;
>
But he wasn't. His published figures are too good to be real:
they don't pass a Chi-Square test, meaning that
Richard Baker wrote:
>
> Which is not to say that Mendel wasn't an excellent scientist;
>
But he wasn't. His published figures are too good to be real:
they don't pass a Chi-Square test, meaning that he adjusted
them to look better than what he found in his experiments :-)
Alberto Monteiro
_
JDG said:
> Strangely? Catholics basically founded the science of genetics a
> long time ago to name but one example
I see that David has already responded to this, but I thought I would
repost my response to your last email claiming that Catholics invented
genetics in case you never read i
At 09:32 PM Friday 10/22/04, JDG wrote:
At 06:09 PM 10/22/2004 -0700 David Brin wrote:
>Both faiths are theologically compatible with science.
> Strangely, Catholicism has also turned itself into a
>sect that expresses profound enthusiasm for science in
>a macro-cosmos, despite theological
Strangel
--- JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 06:09 PM 10/22/2004 -0700 David Brin wrote:
> >Both faiths are theologically compatible with
> science.
> > Strangely, Catholicism has also turned itself into
> a
> >sect that expresses profound enthusiasm for science
> in
> >a macro-cosmos, despite theolog
At 08:09 PM Friday 10/22/04, David Brin wrote:
--- Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You been taking the missionary discussions or
> something? What you just
> described is basic LDS theology: God is our
> Heavenly Father. He sent us
> to this earth and withheld the direct knowledge
At 06:09 PM 10/22/2004 -0700 David Brin wrote:
>Both faiths are theologically compatible with science.
> Strangely, Catholicism has also turned itself into a
>sect that expresses profound enthusiasm for science in
>a macro-cosmos, despite theological
Strangely? Catholics basically founded the s
--- Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You been taking the missionary discussions or
> something? What you just
> described is basic LDS theology: God is our
> Heavenly Father. He sent us
> to this earth and withheld the direct knowledge of
> this so we can learn and
> grow by ma
At 04:24 PM Friday 10/22/04, d.brin wrote:
NAME THE BEASTS
Some of my own theological thoughts are incorporated into my new graphic
novel, THE LIFE EATERS. If there is a Creator, He clearly intends that
things remain vague enough that we must use the word "if" about
Him. (Otherwise, He'd appea
NAME THE BEASTS
Some of my own theological thoughts are incorporated into my new
graphic novel, THE LIFE EATERS. If there is a Creator, He clearly
intends that things remain vague enough that we must use the word
"if" about Him. (Otherwise, He'd appear overhead in some blatant,
unambiguous wa
11 matches
Mail list logo
