--- Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Damon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The idea of a heroic Indian fighter is out of
fashion these days, for good reason.
? Not my my circles it isn't out of fasion at all.
In fact the latest tribal
newspaper has several stories on wariors who
? Not my my circles it isn't out of fasion at all. In fact the latest tribal
newspaper has several stories on wariors who are serving in the middle east.
What would the good reason be?
Umm, an indian fighter is one who fights indians!
Damon.
--- Damon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
? Not my my circles it isn't out of fasion at all. In fact the latest
tribal
newspaper has several stories on wariors who are serving in the middle
east.
What would the good reason be?
Umm, an indian fighter is one who fights indians!
Ha! Is an
At 10:27 AM 6/27/03 -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
--- Damon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
? Not my my circles it isn't out of fasion at all. In fact the latest
tribal
newspaper has several stories on wariors who are serving in the middle
east.
What would the good reason be?
Umm, an indian fighter
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a long time custer was considered by history to
have been very brave and
a good warior. As it turns out he wasn't.
_
Jan
I think what Jan was referring to in his post about Custer was not the
man's personal bravery nor his skills (or lack thereof) of a tactician. I
think what he was referring to was the concept of the Last Stand as a
heroic battle to the last. The reality, of course, is that Custer vastly
--- Damon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what Jan was referring to in his post about Custer was not the
man's personal bravery nor his skills (or lack thereof) of a tactician.
Well I was refering to both actualy. The last stand and the BS marketing
that led up to it. Custer was not all his
