On 7/4/05, William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4 Jul 2005, at 11:56 pm, Leonard Matusik wrote:
> >> On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 02:21:08 -0500 Gary Denton wrote:
> >> Best comic book movie - Spiderman 2.
> > best??? Including Blade2?? Daredevil?? Maybe if Peter Parker would
> > take up drin
On 4 Jul 2005, at 11:56 pm, Leonard Matusik wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 02:21:08 -0500 Gary Denton wrote:
In our group there was some support for the idea he was the best
Batman but not the best Bruce Wayne.
I was not altogether fond of this movie - it suffers from the
Wagnerian elitism
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 02:21:08 -0500 Gary Denton wrote:
>In our group there was some support for the idea he was the best
>Batman but not the best Bruce Wayne.
>I was not altogether fond of this movie - it suffers from the
>Wagnerian elitism Brin has written about that exists in some genre
>films.
From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: RE: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star
Trek signs off tonight
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:55:57 -0230
From: "Robert Seeberger"
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Subject: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek
signs off tonight
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 14:29:26 -0500
- Original Message -
On 7/2/05, Martin Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/2/05, Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >>Notice how we get a different Batman for every decade, and the
> > >>current one is said to be the best yet.
> > >
> > > Christian Bale? Who says?
> >
> > I for one do.
>
> Me and
On 2 Jul 2005, at 8:29 pm, Robert Seeberger wrote:
I don't see how there can be any doubt that Batman Begins is by a very
long shot the best Batman film, heck, the best film from a comic book
source ever made.
It is about time someone made such a film for the grownups.
I think Sin City is a
On 7/2/05, Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Notice how we get a different Batman for every decade, and the
> >>current one is said to be the best yet.
> >
> > Christian Bale? Who says?
>
> I for one do.
Me and all. Not only is he a very good bat, he is the best Bruce
Wayne by a mi
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek
signs off tonight
>
>>From: "PAT MATHEWS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "PAT MATHEWS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Notice how we get a different Batman for every decade, and the current one
is said to be the best yet.
Christian Bale? Who says?
-Twavis
www.fourthturning.com, the Culture & Values site, "Batban Begins" t
From: "Nick Lidster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'"
Subject: RE: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off
tonight
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:53:01 -0230
as something that myself an
From: "PAT MATHEWS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off
tonight
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 08:48:04 -0600
Notice how we get a different Batman for every decade,
> Nick Lidster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something that we have discussed has been running 2
> separate shows that take
> place during the same time period about 20yrs post
> Nemesis. That way you can
> bring in the aging TNG DS9 and Voyager characters in
> some roles as admirals
> or retired
At 09:48 AM Friday 7/1/2005, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
Hoo boy! "We, the people of the United States of Backofbeyond"
They did that episode.
E Plebnista Maru
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of PAT MATHEWS
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:18 PM
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off
tonight
>From: "Travis Edmunds" <
From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have been hoping for a while that we'd see a darker Federation.
We did, in DS-9, which I loved. Apparently, viewers didn't. When TV finally
reran it, it was daytimes when I'm in school (Sob)
A
Fed from the perspective of colony worlds who had not
The stuff I don't get to immediately and then forget about afterwards...
From: Warren Ockrassa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off
tonight
Date: Fri, 13 May 20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Edmunds
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 12:01 AM
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off
tonight
>From: "Gary Nunn" <
On May 13, 2005, at 8:12 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Presumably you would suggest that the planet in question be a former
Klingon world whose name rendered into Roman characters looks a little
like iRaQ' . . . ? And the captain's name might be, oh, maybe
"George" something?
Actually no. More a
At 09:59 PM Friday 5/13/2005, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On May 13, 2005, at 7:30 PM, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As most of us know, Star Trek Enterprise signs off tonight with two back to
back episodes. ... I wonder what the next incarnation of Star Trek will be?
Hard
On May 13, 2005, at 7:30 PM, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As most of us know, Star Trek Enterprise signs off tonight with two
back to
back episodes. ... I wonder what the next incarnation of Star Trek
will be?
Hard to say. Personally though I'd like to see a jump t
From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'"
Subject: Star Trek signs off tonight
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:35:03 -0400
As most of us know, Star Trek Enterprise signs off tonight with two back to
back episodes. ... I wonder what the next i
22 matches
Mail list logo
