From: Russell Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Finished the new Harry Potter
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:53:17 +1000
Matt Grimaldi wrote:
E. Some of us have the book, but have t
Matt Grimaldi wrote:
E. Some of us have the book, but have to wait
for their significant others to finish it first,
as it was a birthday gift.
You're lucky - I'm queued up behind a 10 year old... Chances are he'll
take longer to finish it than your SO.
Cheers
Russell C.
_
> Gautam Makunda wrote:
>
> > Why isn't anyone discussing this?
>
William Taylor wrote:
>
>
> C. Because Rowling isn't a Hoon.
Perhaps she can be persuaded to include
Hoon and/or Tytlal characters?
> D. No one else reads that friggen fast?
E. Some of us have the book, but have to wait
fo
> From: Gautam Mukunda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > William Taylor
> >
> > D. No one else reads that friggen fast?
>
> I figured I'd be a little behind the curve - I didn't
> get it until about 1:00 this afternoon. Knowing the
> people on this
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 12:20 am, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Why isn't anyone discussing this? Anyways, it's
marvelous. Rowling has, once again, surpassed herself
- this one is even better than the last.
My dear old dad had his copy ordered so he could pick it up on
Saturday. And by way of "is
Gautam wrote:
Why isn't anyone discussing this?
I first read the first four Harry Potter books when my wife's German
grandmother who lives and works in Spain came for a visit and gave my wife
and me the British editions. There really aren't that many differences, a
word here, a phrase there, bu
Kevin Tarr wrote:
> At 04:20 PM 6/21/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >Why isn't anyone discussing this?
> >
> >Gautam Mukunda
>
>
> Seriously? Are there really that many HP readers on this list? I haven't
> read any, and never plan too. Not trying to be snobbish or pretentious,
but
> I just don't have ti
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> > Sorry for the top posting here, but PLEASE NO HARRY
> > SPOILERS!
> >
> > George A
>
> I thought I was being pretty careful...
---
You were, you were. But your request to discuss the book; well, as much as
this list likes to discuss things . . . ;
At 04:20 PM 6/21/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Why isn't anyone discussing this?
Gautam Mukunda
Seriously? Are there really that many HP readers on this list? I haven't
read any, and never plan too. Not trying to be snobbish or pretentious, but
I just don't have time to waste on it.
Right now on my
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> Why isn't anyone discussing this?
Started reading it last evening and went straight to bed after finishing
it.
> Anyways, it's
> marvelous. Rowling has, once again, surpassed herself
> - this one is even better than the last.
I'd say it's good. And definitely more co
--- "G. D. Akin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the top posting here, but PLEASE NO HARRY
> SPOILERS!
>
> George A
I thought I was being pretty careful...
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Sorry for the top posting here, but PLEASE NO HARRY SPOILERS!
George A
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 8:20 AM
Subject: Finished the new H
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> Why isn't anyone discussing this?
Um, because I don't have my hands on it, and even if I did, I'd be doing
well to read 50 pages a day? :) Seriously, I would like to, but I
think I'll just be asking for a copy for Christmas, as I don't forsee
being able to read it in
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> William Taylor
>
> D. No one else reads that friggen fast?
I figured I'd be a little behind the curve - I didn't
get it until about 1:00 this afternoon. Knowing the
people on this list, I figured there'd be at least a
few midnight buyers. I'm g
In a message dated 6/21/2003 4:22:24 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Why isn't anyone discussing this?
A. Because Rowling isn't writing about Christianity or Catholicism
B. Because Rowling isn't bashing Republicans.
or
C. Because Rowling isn't a Hoon.
William Tayl
Why isn't anyone discussing this? Anyways, it's
marvelous. Rowling has, once again, surpassed herself
- this one is even better than the last. Harry has
matured with remarkable realism - I remember being 15,
and reading the book was disturbingly familiar. It
wasn't as funny as the first four -
16 matches
Mail list logo
