At 11:18 PM Thursday 6/2/2005, pencimen wrote:
Leonard Matusik wrote:
Gee Doug that sounds great, really
Actually, it's just supposed to mean that nothing is off topic here.
It was coined by one of the lists very early members (was it Marco?) in
response to a question similar to yours.
Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:08:27 -0500
At 11:18 PM Thursday 6/2/2005, pencimen wrote:
Leonard Matusik wrote:
Gee Doug that sounds great, really
Actually, it's just supposed to mean that nothing is off topic here.
It was coined by one of the lists very
Gee Doug that sounds great, really I'd like to join you in that sentiment,
but I still have a box and a half of incense left to burn and the The Holy
Brazen Altar of Arthur C Clark
I'd like to get back with you when I'm through though...
anybody else?
Leonard J Matusik [EMAIL
Leonard Matusik wrote:
Gee Doug that sounds great, really
Actually, it's just supposed to mean that nothing is off topic here.
It was coined by one of the lists very early members (was it Marco?) in
response to a question similar to yours.
Doug
Does Killer Bs Discussion have an orthodoxy? (or isn't anybody allowed to ask
the question?)
d.brin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'Hear me: an unconscious people, an indoctrinated people, a
people fed only partisan information and opinion that confirm their
own bias, a people made morbidly obese in
On May 28, 2005, at 4:16 PM, d.brin wrote:
Good seeing some of you at the excellent FiRe Conference.
I have an article in a new book of critical essays about George
Orwell. But the following is cribbed from a recent speech by Bill
Moyers. Frankly, I do not always find him on.
[...]
On May 31, 2005, at 7:33 AM, Leonard Matusik wrote:
Does Killer Bs Discussion have an orthodoxy? (or isn't anybody
allowed
to ask the question?)
No orthodoxy: ask away.
If you think Dr. Brin's post (or anyone else's) is full of crap, you are
certainly free to try to prove it or provide a
Behalf Of Dave Land
On May 31, 2005, at 7:33 AM, Leonard Matusik wrote:
Does Killer Bs Discussion have an orthodoxy? (or isn't anybody
allowed
to ask the question?)
No orthodoxy: ask away.
If you think Dr. Brin's post (or anyone else's) is full of
crap, you are
certainly free
On May 31, 2005, at 1:22 PM, Dave Land wrote:
If you think Dr. Brin's post (or anyone else's) is full of crap, you
are
certainly free to try to prove it or provide a demonstrably better
alternative view.
Politely, though. As much as possible. ;)
--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor,
Uh, actually David.. I take the position that most people, including myself,
are full of crap (meaning they operate from a relatively large deficit of
self-knowlege, their motives are flawed, their meanings unclear). I am, of
course, very oriented toward the views of Dr. Carl Rogers in this
Leonard wrote:
Does Killer Bs Discussion have an orthodoxy? (or isn't anybody allowed
to ask the question?)
All is Brin.
--
Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
John Horn wrote:
Just remember to change the subject to start with Brin: as Dr.
Brin filters the list and only reads those posts that start with
that string.
Thanks for the reminder! I totally forgot.
Kevin Street
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Good seeing some of you at the excellent FiRe Conference.
I have an article in a new book of critical essays about George
Orwell. But the following is cribbed from a recent speech by Bill
Moyers. Frankly, I do not always find him on.
But this time he is
---
Without a trace of irony, the
13 matches
Mail list logo
