* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If there is a crisis today, then a big correction is needed now. But
if the crisis is many years away, as virtually every analysis says,
then there is no need for major change.
Yeah, yeah, the longer you put off fixing the problem the more your
Erik Reuter wrote:
I've asked you before, and you have repeatedly failed to answer.
Our conversation on this topic ended when my perception was that you
were using abusive language.
Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
I've asked you before, and you have repeatedly failed to answer.
Our conversation on this topic ended when my perception was that you
were using abusive language.
Wrong, as usual. You posted twice in the thread without
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:29:56 -0500, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If there is a crisis today, then a big correction is needed now. But
if the crisis is many years away, as virtually every analysis says,
then there is no need for major
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:50:27 -0800, Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to suggest a navigational metaphor for why smaller changes,
rather than drastic ones (of the sort implied by fiscal child abuse
and similar hyperbole) are appropriate.
Imagine you're piloting an airplane and
On Jan 25, 2005, at 4:21 PM, Mauro Diotallevi wrote:
Imagine a trip from Boston to Miami. If you don't need to make any
stops along the way, then no matter where you are on the journey, if
you discover you are off-course, you point yourself back towards
Miami. But if you need to make stops in
