--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, it's just ironic that one group is angered by
another who does what the first said it would.
Come on Deboarah, I know that you are better than this, sure you see
a different between Nazi Germany crossing international borders
--- iaamoac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's just ironic that one group is angered by
another who does what the first said it would.
Come on Deboarah, I know that you are better than
this, sure you see
a different between Nazi Germany crossing
- Original Message -
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Precedents
gentle smile - biting tongue, biting tongue...
I think Ulthacalthing's corona would be at full fluff
- of course
--- iaamoac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- J.D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unprecedented Logic
Why slippery-slope arguments against invading
Iraq don't hold water.
By Eugene Volokh
Perhaps second thoughts are warranted:
On 24 Mar 2003 at 15:43, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Thus, while Turkey sendin 1,000 troops into Iraq is
disappointing -
it isn't necessarily terribly significant at this
point.
I truly hope you are right about this.
Something which was brought up on the news which I didn't consider is
Deborah Harrell wrote:
...Thus, the insertion of 1,000 troops, while
it sounds like a lot to us, is really pretty much
small potatoes.
Remember, the Coalition has around 300,000 troops.
Thus, while Turkey sendin 1,000 troops into Iraq is
disappointing -
it isn't necessarily
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- J.D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unprecedented Logic
Why slippery-slope arguments against invading Iraq
don't hold water.
By Eugene Volokh
Perhaps second thoughts are warranted:
- Original Message -
From: iaamoac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: Precedents
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- J.D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unprecedented
in Iraqwe're justified in going in and taking over
Taiwan'? Should we be moved by this concern about
precedents, which is a form of the slippery-slope
argument? Not really, and here's why...
big snip
...Precedents and slippery slopes can be powerful
forces
and can sound like powerful
