On 2/9/11, Dan Minette danmine...@att.net wrote:
To start with, this is not a study on US induced deaths in Iraq. More
importantly, this story about the Fallujah cluster is something you
have simply made up.
Are you saying that Fallujah wasn't excluded because of problems with the
results
On 2/9/11, Dan Minette danmine...@att.net wrote:
quote
Had the Fallujah sample been included, the survey's estimate would have been
of an excess of about 298,000 deaths, with 200,000 concentrated in the 3% of
Iraq around Fallujah
end quote
OK, 200k deaths in and right around Fallujah
Oh, I see, Wikipedia. I am now totally convinced of your standing as
a eminent public health epidemiologist.
Just to get the population. The critical documentation was that they _did_
exclude the Fallujah area and that their techniques came up with 200k deaths
in that region which, if true,
I think there have been discussions here previously about vaccines, and
while there might well be some people, especially children, who can have
difficulty with multiple vaccines, the issue of vaccination causing autism
is particularly fear-inducing. But the 1998 'study' has been judged
On Feb 9, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Dan Minette wrote:
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and not attribute to malice
what can
be explained by incompetence.
You, sir, are un-American :-). Well said.
Dave
___
On 2/9/11, Dan Minette danmine...@att.net wrote:
The Lancet, in my book, has published other studies that were questionable
from the beginning. For example, they published a study on US induced
deaths in Iraq that found that a quarter of the population of Faluja had
died due to the early
Martin wrote
To start with, this is not a study on US induced deaths in Iraq. More
importantly, this story about the Fallujah cluster is something you
have simply made up.
Are you saying that Fallujah wasn't excluded because of problems with the
results there? Seriously? Or are you saying I'm
I'm really suppose to be working, but this took me 5 minutes to find:
From
http://www.iraqanalysis.org/local/041101lancetpmos.html
Which argued for the Lancet article and against the British government
response and I quote:
quote
Had the Fallujah sample been included, the survey's estimate
