Chad Cooper wrote:
>
> I ran this on some messages for a self-help list I subscribe to. I found
> that in almost every case, it resolved the messages as female. This list is
> characteristic in that little confrontation occurs between members, even
> when a post is decidely aggressive. However, a
- perhaps creating a confrontation index based upon a lists
masculinity or feminity tendencies.
Nerd From Hell
> -Original Message-
> From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:17 AM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: Scouted: The Gen
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> >From: Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Scouted: The Gender Genie
> >Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:17:
From: Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Scouted: The Gender Genie
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:17:14 -0500
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.html
>
> Very cool, even though it got the two graphs I ran wrong.
My mom *just* got hold of this one.
She used the same sort of technique for feeding it passages, i.e.,
cutting and pasting something already written.
She participates
Jan Coffey wrote:
>
> I am sure we will all agree this algorithum is somewhat flawed. In practice,
> only half were acurate.
>
> This algorithum does not seem to work. In practice it was acuate only %50 of
> the time.
What's interesting is that it had me pegged correctly for 70% of my
responses,
I am sure we will all agree this algorithum is somewhat flawed. In practice,
only half were acurate.
This algorithum does not seem to work. In practice it was acuate only %50 of
the time.
--- Jon Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.html
>
> Very cool, even t
--- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Gabriel wrote:
> >
> > http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.html
> >
> > Very cool, even though it got the two graphs I ran
> wrong.
>
> I submitted 10 quotes from things I'd sent out to
> the list in the past 7
> days, carefully selecting agai
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.html
>
> Very cool, even though it got the two graphs I ran wrong.
I submitted 10 quotes from things I'd sent out to the list in the past 7
days, carefully selecting against anything that even hinted at
pregnancy. :) It came back 7 fe
> Very cool, even though it got the two graphs I ran wrong.
>
I just typed in the first 3 paragraphs of my draft novel, and it guessed the
author is female. Hmmm...not the last time I went to the bathroom...
Tom Beck
www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org
"I always knew I'd see the
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:39:21PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.html
>
> Very cool, even though it got the two graphs I ran wrong.
Not so cool. It got me wrong, which doesn't prove much. But if you
tell it whether or not it was wrong, it pops up statistics for
11 matches
Mail list logo
