At 11:33 PM 1/9/2003 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote:
>This kind of censorship is indicative of a leader who lacks confidence
>in his own powers of persuasion and the legitimacy of his course. Why
>else would Bush be so interested in hiding evidence of dissent within
>the American populace?
Because
At 07:22 AM 1/10/2003 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote:
>But what do protesters have to do with security? If you were attempting
>to kill the president would you carry a protest sign and such? More
>likely you would mingle with the pro crowd, waving a flag and such.
>
>Doug
>
>Given a modicum of int
Kevin Tarr wrote:
>
>> Ah, the joys of living in a commie country!
>
> When did you move? China or Cuba comrade?
>
I didn't move to Communism, Companheiro, but
Communism moved to me
Alberto Monteiro
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 11:41 AM 1/10/2003 -0200, you wrote:
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
>
> (...) Bush, having a higher security threat against
> him than any of his predecessors since Lincoln, I
> have more sympathy for.
>
OTOH, have you read about Lula's security?
You probably didn't: it's *none*.
Ah, the joys of living
At 07:15 10-01-2003 -0800, Nick Arnett wrote:
Crazy people usually aren't able to hold rational political ideas.
Yup -- that's why the US has the Republican Party...
Jeroen "Casual observations" van Baardwijk
LEGAL NOTICE:
By replying to this message, you understand and accept that your
From: Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Spot On
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:22:45 -0800
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Carter. He began his Presidency as he conducted it,
with a dumb idea that ignored security concerns. Ford
was the target of two assassination attempts (thus
lead
--- Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How is this measured? Seems to me that potential
> assassins in this country
> are more motivated by the idea killing the president
> than by any political
> beliefs. Crazy people usually aren't able to hold
> rational political ideas.
>
> Nick
Al Q'
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 11:41 AM 1/10/03 -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
>
> (...) Bush, having a higher security threat against
> him than any of his predecessors since Lincoln, I
> have more sympathy for.
>
OTOH, have you read about Lula's security?
Who's Lula?
M
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Gautam Mukunda
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Spot On
...
> Clinton was probably the most governed by the Secret
> Serv
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Carter. He began his Presidency as he conducted it,
with a dumb idea that ignored security concerns. Ford
was the target of two assassination attempts (thus
leading to the eternal question - why would you want
to kill Gerald Ford?) and Reagan was almost killed.
Clinton w
At 11:41 AM 1/10/03 -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
>
> (...) Bush, having a higher security threat against
> him than any of his predecessors since Lincoln, I
> have more sympathy for.
>
OTOH, have you read about Lula's security?
Who's Lula?
Most times when I hear the nam
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
>
> (...) Bush, having a higher security threat against
> him than any of his predecessors since Lincoln, I
> have more sympathy for.
>
OTOH, have you read about Lula's security?
You probably didn't: it's *none*.
Ah, the joys of living in a commie country!
Albert
--- Kevin Tarr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin T.
> *Just saying that while there have been protestors
> for 200 years, Ford and
> Reagan being targets of assassinations may have
> raised the secret services
> hackles too much. Didn't some president within
> living memory walk the
> inaugura
At 11:33 PM 1/9/2003 -0800, you wrote:
http://www.dubyadubyadubya.com/
One of the articles referenced:
http://www.sptimes.com/2002/10/13/Columns/President_seems_unabl.shtml
President seems unable to bear the sight or sound of dissent
In town after town where Bush has come to raise money or ma
14 matches
Mail list logo
