At 07:32 AM 10/22/2002 -0700 Nick Arnett wrote:
A different approach to the question of world government is to speculate on
why nations emerged, then see if there's anything similar happening now.
The most analogous situations to the emergence of a world government are
the formation of the United
Doug wrote:
It's highly unlikely that there will be a dominant WG,
but that doesn't mean that there could not be some sort
of loose federation that represents most nations and
has some method of collecting revenue,
electing officials, policing, etc.
When the World g*vernment
Dan Minette wrote:
Because it is highly probable. The world has had states of one kind or
another for at least 4000 years. The idea that, after all this time, they
would wither away and a world government would form in 50 years is
possible, but not very likely.
Why would states have to
A different approach to the question of world government is to speculate on
why nations emerged, then see if there's anything similar happening now.
What is behind the fact that people are willing to love, hate, kill and die
for an essentially imaginary (that is, little basis in physical reality)
In a message dated 10/22/2002 7:34:49 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see the Internet as disruptive in much the same way as
printing was 500 years ago.
More so to me. I sell used books for a living. On the internet only.
Already I can see the trend of the past
In a message dated 10/21/2002 10:14:07 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, I argue for much more than that. I think it is very unlikely that a
a world govement would form within 50 years. I've already given my first
arguement: it is rare that 4000+ years of history
