Re: For your entertainment, Re: Assumptions

2002-12-06 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
"Ronn! Blankenship" wrote: > At 11:51 PM 12/5/02 +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: > > >So that brings us on to the toilet. It has to be installed into more or less > >the space where the old toilet was, only now it is a hanging toilet > > I'm not sure what you mean by a "hanging toilet" .

Re: For your entertainment, Re: Assumptions

2002-12-05 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 11:51 PM 12/5/02 +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: So that brings us on to the toilet. It has to be installed into more or less the space where the old toilet was, only now it is a hanging toilet I'm not sure what you mean by a "hanging toilet" . . . can you amplify? that is pla

Re: For your entertainment, Re: Assumptions

2002-12-05 Thread Julia Thompson
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: > So lucky for us there is this very nice new stuff on the market with very > nice rubber fittings that make it possible for any laymen to puzzle a > suitable and airtight PVC pipeform together without having to glue the > stuff. I loved doing that... I mean that

Re: For your entertainment, Re: Assumptions

2002-12-05 Thread Russell Chapman
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: 2) We'd like to keep the original waste pipe in place, just in case we'd have to move and they are demanding restoring the old situation. Um - are you leasing/renting this place? I'd always assumed from the sheer amount of hard work (not mentioning expense) th