Dave Land wrote:
A pack of Saudi terrorists hijacked planes on the date of 9/11. A pack
of Robin Hood-in-Reverse
thieves then hijacked society on the basis of 9/11.
Nice rethorics.
Sonja
GCU: =off
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Dan,
OK, I agree that we cannot stop all terrorist-type activities. But, I
think it is a reasonable long term stretch goal to reduce terrorists to
just another type of criminal...without the ability to alter society.
First of all, I'd like to commend both you and my old friend Nick for
carrying on
Dan Minette wrote:
I'd give him a bit more leeway than that. While he and we are not God, he
and we can be willing instruments of God's will for the world. The idea of
the United States as "the last best hope of mankind" didn't begin with him
or Reaganit is a quote from Lincoln.
Lincoln -- an
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: Who does GWB think he is?
> Dan Minette wrote:
>
> Anyway, you're startin
At 08:26 PM 22/10/04 -0700, Nick wrote:
Keith Henson wrote:
I think that if you want to try to understand why humans do things you
have to look at how our psychological mechanisms were shaped in the EEA,
the environment of evolutionary adaption.
I have to? There's no other way? ;-) No non-evol
Keith Henson wrote:
I think that if you want to try to understand why humans do things you
have to look at how our psychological mechanisms were shaped in the EEA,
the environment of evolutionary adaption.
I have to? There's no other way? ;-) No non-evolutionary
explanations? Not that I am p
At 02:49 PM 21/10/04 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
Dan Minette wrote:
By no stretch of the imagination was Bin Laden opressed.
Certainly not economically. His personal concerns are unknown to me, but
I'm certain that he may be reacting to his perception of how "his people,"
however he might categori
Dan Minette wrote:
I'm trying to figure out your arguement. The question is whether we'll
stop terrorism by simply being as just as we can
That's not a question for me. I don't think we're called to "stop
terrorism." I don't think that's within human power. The question for
me is how to love
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: Who does GWB think he is?
> Dan Minette wrote:
>
> > By no stretch of the imagi
Dan Minette wrote:
By no stretch of the imagination was Bin Laden opressed.
Certainly not economically. His personal concerns are unknown to me,
but I'm certain that he may be reacting to his perception of how "his
people," however he might categorize them, are treated. I'm not sure it
matte
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Who does GWB think he is?
Finishing a thought.
> It is
> > > acceptable to
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Who does GWB think he is?
> Dan Minette wrote:
>
> > But, here is the questi
Dan Minette wrote:
Jesus calls us to be peace-makers, not dividers of the world into "good"
nations and "evil-doers."
But, here is the question that has faced Christians for ~1600 years. It is
acceptable to fight to protect innocents?
I don't think that's the question at hand, although it's a fi
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 10:43 AM
Subject: Who does GWB think he is?
> Following up on John Edwards' yucky statement that paralytics will rise
> up from their wheelchairs
14 matches
Mail list logo
