Brin: Lots of Cars and Trucks, No Traffic Signs or Lights: Chaos or Calm?

2013-05-02 Thread ALBERTO VIEIRA FERREIRA MONTEIRO
This sounds like something you were saying some time ago: http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2013/04/lots-cars-and-trucks-no-traffic-signs-or-lights-chaos-or-calm/5152/ Except: "Shared space is a term that simply describes a shift in thinking away from the regulated highway towards

Re: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science

2008-10-15 Thread Deborah Harrell
> Rceeberger quoted: > http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i21/21b02001.htm > 4. Evidence for a discovery is anecdotal. If modern science > has learned > anything in the past century, it is to distrust anecdotal > evidence. Because > anecdotes have a very strong emotional impact, they serve > to k

Re: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science

2008-10-13 Thread Nick Arnett
I'm guessing that this is what you folks are talking about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive Nick ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science

2008-10-13 Thread Claes Wallin
Andrew Crystall wrote: > On 12 Oct 2008 at 23:27, xponentrob wrote: >> From: "Andrew Crystall" >>> Also, there's a major problem with calling the EM Engine, as it >>> stands, entirely bogus. Because there's a demonstration version the >>> scientists behind it have built which generates thrust. >>>

Re: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science

2008-10-13 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 12 Oct 2008 at 23:27, xponentrob wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Andrew Crystall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Killer Bs DDavid Brin et al Discussion" > Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 2:40 PM > Subject: Re: The Seven Warning Signs of Bog

Re: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science

2008-10-12 Thread xponentrob
- Original Message - From: "Andrew Crystall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs DDavid Brin et al Discussion" Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 2:40 PM Subject: Re: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science > On 12 Oct 2008 at 12:00, Rceeberger wrote: > >

Re: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science

2008-10-12 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 12:00 PM Sunday 10/12/2008, Rceeberger wrote: >http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i21/21b02001.htm >* > >[snip] > >7. The discoverer must propose new laws of nature to explain an observation. >A new law of nature, invoked

Re: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science

2008-10-12 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 12 Oct 2008 at 12:00, Rceeberger wrote: > http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i21/21b02001.htm > * The article's from 1993. Also, there's a major problem with calling the EM Engine, as it stands, entirely bogus. Becaus

The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science

2008-10-12 Thread Rceeberger
preview questionable scientific testimony and advise a judge on whether a jury should be exposed to it. Judges are still concerned about meeting their responsibilities under the Daubert decision, and a group of them asked me how to recognize questionable scientific claims. What are the warning signs

Top Eleven Signs Mr. Spock Doesn't Like You

2007-10-06 Thread Robert Seeberger
http://www.bbspot.com/News/2007/09/top-11-signs-mr-spock-does-not-like-you.html 11. He uses you as a guinea pig for the new, more painful Vulcan nerve pinch. 10. Always keeps giving you the "angry eyebrow" treatment. 9. Lately, after saying "Live Long And Prosper

Re: Signs

2007-10-01 Thread Charlie Bell
On 01/10/2007, at 5:11 PM, Ray Ludenia wrote: > A few sent by my brother-in-law from Africa. > > http://raylud.googlepages.com/africa ...and even here in lovely Victoria there is some spectacularly stupid signage http://www.whittlesealeader.com.au/article/ 2007/04/24/13551_wpv_news.html

Re: Signs

2007-10-01 Thread Ray Ludenia
A few sent by my brother-in-law from Africa. http://raylud.googlepages.com/africa Regards, Ray. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Signs

2007-09-30 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 08:45 PM Sunday 9/30/2007, Robert Seeberger wrote: >Here, have a taste: > >http://pictoral.blogspot.com/2007/09/jesus-forgives-you.html I thought from your tag line it might be a reference to one of the photos of the "Jesus Restaurant" . . . -- Ronn! :) ___

Re: Signs

2007-09-30 Thread Robert Seeberger
On 9/30/2007 7:48:17 PM, Ronn! Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > At 03:07 PM Sunday 9/30/2007, Robert Seeberger wrote: > >Looky Looky!!! > >http://www.flickr.com/groups/badsignage/pool/ > > > > Bilingulism run amuck: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/hansol/82654761/ > > Here, have a taste

Re: Signs

2007-09-30 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 03:07 PM Sunday 9/30/2007, Robert Seeberger wrote: >Looky Looky!!! >http://www.flickr.com/groups/badsignage/pool/ Bilingulism run amuck: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hansol/82654761/ -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/br

Re: Signs

2007-09-30 Thread Dave Land
Robert, > http://www.flickr.com/groups/badsignage/pool/ My favorite of the moment: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bderwest/1464734907/in/pool-badsignage/ A true patriot with his hand-lettered sign: AMERICANS HELP US BOYCOTT MEXICO RESPECT ARE-COUNTRY SPEAK ENGLISH Dave One na

Signs

2007-09-30 Thread Robert Seeberger
Looky Looky!!! http://www.flickr.com/groups/badsignage/pool/ And one of the best ones: http://www.flickr.com/photos/umlaut555/104912688/in/pool-badsignage/ xponent http://www.flickr.com/photos/pedestriantype/531010921/in/pool-badsignage/ Maru rob

Re: Best Comicbook Movie, was Re: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-06 Thread Gary Denton
On 7/4/05, William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4 Jul 2005, at 11:56 pm, Leonard Matusik wrote: > >> On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 02:21:08 -0500 Gary Denton wrote: > >> Best comic book movie - Spiderman 2. > > best??? Including Blade2?? Daredevil?? Maybe if Peter Parker would > > take up drin

Re: Best Comicbook Movie, was Re: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-04 Thread William T Goodall
On 4 Jul 2005, at 11:56 pm, Leonard Matusik wrote: On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 02:21:08 -0500 Gary Denton wrote: In our group there was some support for the idea he was the best Batman but not the best Bruce Wayne. I was not altogether fond of this movie - it suffers from the Wagnerian elitism

Best Comicbook Movie, was Re: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-04 Thread Leonard Matusik
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 02:21:08 -0500 Gary Denton wrote: >In our group there was some support for the idea he was the best >Batman but not the best Bruce Wayne. >I was not altogether fond of this movie - it suffers from the >Wagnerian elitism Brin has written about that exists in some genre >films.

RE: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-04 Thread Travis Edmunds
From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion To: brin-l@mccmedia.com Subject: RE: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:55:57 -0230 From: "Robert Seeberger"

RE: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-04 Thread Travis Edmunds
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion To: "Killer Bs Discussion" Subject: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 14:29:26 -0500 - Original Message -

Re: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-03 Thread Gary Denton
On 7/2/05, Martin Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/2/05, Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Notice how we get a different Batman for every decade, and the > > >>current one is said to be the best yet. > > > > > > Christian Bale? Who says? > > > > I for one do. > > Me and

Re: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-02 Thread William T Goodall
On 2 Jul 2005, at 8:29 pm, Robert Seeberger wrote: I don't see how there can be any doubt that Batman Begins is by a very long shot the best Batman film, heck, the best film from a comic book source ever made. It is about time someone made such a film for the grownups. I think Sin City is a

Re: Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-02 Thread Martin Lewis
On 7/2/05, Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Notice how we get a different Batman for every decade, and the > >>current one is said to be the best yet. > > > > Christian Bale? Who says? > > I for one do. Me and all. Not only is he a very good bat, he is the best Bruce Wayne by a mi

Batman [was:] Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-02 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 11:40 AM Subject: Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight > >>From: "PAT MATHEWS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-02 Thread PAT MATHEWS
From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "PAT MATHEWS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Notice how we get a different Batman for every decade, and the current one is said to be the best yet. Christian Bale? Who says? -Twavis www.fourthturning.com, the Culture & Values site, "Batban Begins" t

RE: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-02 Thread Travis Edmunds
From: "Nick Lidster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" Subject: RE: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:53:01 -0230 as something that myself an

Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-02 Thread Travis Edmunds
From: "PAT MATHEWS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion To: brin-l@mccmedia.com Subject: Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 08:48:04 -0600 Notice how we get a different Batman for every decade,

RE: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-01 Thread Deborah Harrell
> Nick Lidster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something that we have discussed has been running 2 > separate shows that take > place during the same time period about 20yrs post > Nemesis. That way you can > bring in the aging TNG DS9 and Voyager characters in > some roles as admirals > or retired

Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-01 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 09:48 AM Friday 7/1/2005, PAT MATHEWS wrote: Hoo boy! "We, the people of the United States of Backofbeyond" They did that episode. E Plebnista Maru -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-01 Thread Nick Lidster
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PAT MATHEWS Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:18 PM To: brin-l@mccmedia.com Subject: Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight >From: "Travis Edmunds" <

Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-01 Thread PAT MATHEWS
From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have been hoping for a while that we'd see a darker Federation. We did, in DS-9, which I loved. Apparently, viewers didn't. When TV finally reran it, it was daytimes when I'm in school (Sob) A Fed from the perspective of colony worlds who had not

Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-07-01 Thread Travis Edmunds
The stuff I don't get to immediately and then forget about afterwards... From: Warren Ockrassa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight Date: Fri, 13 May 20

RE: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-05-14 Thread Nick Lidster
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Edmunds Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 12:01 AM To: brin-l@mccmedia.com Subject: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan,was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight >From: "Gary Nunn" <

Re: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-05-14 Thread Damon Agretto
The hot Vulcan was right - she was also right about the poor scripts for most of the first two seasons. So much potential, so much... Damon. Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum." http://www.geocities.co

Re: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-05-14 Thread Gary Denton
I am glad they had the two episodes. The first one showing the quality of the recent episodes and a decent sign off and the second showing the numerous mistakes B&B makes when attempting to do Trek. Mistakes and poor storytelling too many to list here. The hot Vulcan was right - she was also ri

Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-05-13 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On May 13, 2005, at 8:12 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: Presumably you would suggest that the planet in question be a former Klingon world whose name rendered into Roman characters looks a little like iRaQ' . . . ? And the captain's name might be, oh, maybe "George" something? Actually no. More a

Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-05-13 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 09:59 PM Friday 5/13/2005, Warren Ockrassa wrote: On May 13, 2005, at 7:30 PM, Travis Edmunds wrote: From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As most of us know, Star Trek Enterprise signs off tonight with two back to back episodes. ... I wonder what the next incarnation of S

Re: Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-05-13 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On May 13, 2005, at 7:30 PM, Travis Edmunds wrote: From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As most of us know, Star Trek Enterprise signs off tonight with two back to back episodes. ... I wonder what the next incarnation of Star Trek will be? Hard to say. Personally though I'

Fare thee well my beautiful Vulcan, was RE: Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-05-13 Thread Travis Edmunds
From: "Gary Nunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" Subject: Star Trek signs off tonight Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:35:03 -0400 As most of us know, Star Trek Enterprise signs off tonight with two back to back

Star Trek signs off tonight....

2005-05-13 Thread Gary Nunn
As most of us know, Star Trek Enterprise signs off tonight with two back to back episodes. ... I wonder what the next incarnation of Star Trek will be? Gary "Star Trek: Enterprise" 8 p.m., UPN The time has come to wish "Star Trek: Enterprise" farewell, as it warp speeds int

Franken Signs Deal With Progressive Media

2004-01-13 Thread Robert Seeberger
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=509&u=/ap/20040113/ap_on_bi_ge/liberal_radio_franken_5&printer=1 They haven't got a name or a launch date yet, but the entrepreneurs who dream of launching a liberal radio network have just landed themselves a lead man: Comedian and best-selling author A

Top5 Science Fiction - 5/30/03: The Top 9 Signs a VampireSlayer Should Think About Retirement

2003-05-30 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
shtml == May 30, 2003 NOTE FROM GREG: "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" recently aired its last episode. The Top 9 Signs a Vampire Slayer Should Think About Retirement

SCOUTED: Bush signs executive order on SARS quarantine

2003-04-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
Fever; and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Crimean-Congo, South American, and others not yet isolated or named). (b) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which is a disease associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory i

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-18 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Bryon Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 02:22:28 -0500 Kevin Tarr wrote: > > I was going to post the story of

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-16 Thread Bryon Daly
Kevin Tarr wrote: > > I was going to post the story of the helium filled dolls and the woman > climbing out of her sunroof, but it's not a true story. Please do! I heard it a long time ago, and IIRC, it's quite funny. -bryon ___ http://www.mccmedia.

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-16 Thread Doug Pensinger
Julia Thompson wrote: Doug Pensinger wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: Personally, I'd much rather be with Gandhi than Hitler. Julia You been reading Huck Finn? Not lately. Why? This was just my gut reaction to the whole thing when I was exposed to that argument (which was the last straw th

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-16 Thread Julia Thompson
Doug Pensinger wrote: > > Julia Thompson wrote: > > > > >Personally, I'd much rather be with Gandhi than Hitler. > > > > Julia > > > You been reading Huck Finn? Not lately. Why? This was just my gut reaction to the whole thing when I was exposed to that argument (which was the last straw

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-16 Thread Doug Pensinger
Julia Thompson wrote: Personally, I'd much rather be with Gandhi than Hitler. Julia You been reading Huck Finn? Doug ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-16 Thread Julia Thompson
Trent Shipley wrote: > Mennonite theolgy implies that anyone who expects to be among those > Raputured is in grave danger of not being raptured due to egregious > pride > > That is, those who are certain that they are among the elect, aren't. I can sympathize with that point of view. Some o

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-16 Thread Reggie Bautista
Trent Shipley wrote: Mennonite theolgy implies that anyone who expects to be among those Raputured is in grave danger of not being raptured due to egregious pride That is, those who are certain that they are among the elect, aren't. Something about pride goeth-ing before the fall? This would

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-16 Thread Kevin Tarr
At 10:54 AM 3/15/2003 -0600, you wrote: The Fool wrote: > More problematic is the fatalistic worldview of apocalyptic thinking, > Hill said. Many who obsess about the end of the world fail to enjoy the > life they have or reach out to help others in an effort to improve > society, he said. They be

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-15 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 02:52 PM 3/15/03 -0600, Steve Sloan II wrote: The Fool wrote: > "The sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great river > Euphrates, and its water was dried up to prepare the way > for the kings from the East," writes John, possibly the > apostle, of a container of God's anger Known in modern t

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-15 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 10:54 AM 3/15/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote: The Fool wrote: > More problematic is the fatalistic worldview of apocalyptic thinking, > Hill said. Many who obsess about the end of the world fail to enjoy the > life they have or reach out to help others in an effort to improve > society, he said

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-15 Thread Steve Sloan II
The Fool wrote: > “The sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great river > Euphrates, and its water was dried up to prepare the way > for the kings from the East,” writes John, possibly the > apostle, of a container of God’s anger Known in modern times as "a can of whoop-ass." ;-) ___

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-15 Thread Trent Shipley
On Saturday 2003-03-15 09:54, Julia Thompson wrote: > The Fool wrote: > > More problematic is the fatalistic worldview of apocalyptic thinking, > > Hill said. Many who obsess about the end of the world fail to enjoy the > > life they have or reach out to help others in an effort to improve > > soci

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-15 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 11:35 AM 3/15/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote: Alberto Monteiro wrote: > > Julia Thompson wrote: > > > >This is illustrated by a bumper sticker seen on cars of a few Rapturists: > > > >In case of the Rapture, this car will be driverless > > > >That's a hell of a thing to inflict on everyone e

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-15 Thread Julia Thompson
Alberto Monteiro wrote: > > Julia Thompson wrote: > > > >This is illustrated by a bumper sticker seen on cars of a few Rapturists: > > > >In case of the Rapture, this car will be driverless > > > >That's a hell of a thing to inflict on everyone else you're in traffic with! > > > I imgaine that

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-15 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Julia Thompson wrote: > >This is illustrated by a bumper sticker seen on cars of a few Rapturists: > >In case of the Rapture, this car will be driverless > >That's a hell of a thing to inflict on everyone else you're in traffic with! > I imgaine that the ethics of Rapturism would _prevent_ this

Re: Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-15 Thread Julia Thompson
The Fool wrote: > More problematic is the fatalistic worldview of apocalyptic thinking, > Hill said. Many who obsess about the end of the world fail to enjoy the > life they have or reach out to help others in an effort to improve > society, he said. They become “morally complacent.” This is illu

Bible scholars rejoice at signs

2003-03-14 Thread The Fool
http://www.qctimes.com/internal.php?story_id=1009253&t=Nation+%2F+World&c= 26,1009253 The Washington Post Ever since Jesus said only God knows the hour or day of the Second Coming, preachers and self-appointed prophets have been trying to predict when it will happen — and watching the sun rise on

Re: signs, astrology, numerology and other prattling

2003-02-25 Thread Reggie Bautista
Gary wrote: I am not a big believer in signs or astrology, but sometimes the coincidences are simply too amazing. And sometimes the horoscopes are so close to the mark, it is scary. I don't mean the generalized predictions that that could apply to half of the population, I mean straight t

Re: signs, astrology, numerology and other prattling

2003-02-25 Thread Jean-Louis Couturier
At 19:38 2003-02-24 -0500, Gary wrote: Warning, this post is the result of a long day and a tired mind mixed with a little bit of sentimentality, so no flames, virtual bricks or snide comments please :-) Now come on, play fair! I am not a big believer in signs or astrology, but sometimes the

signs, astrology, numerology and other prattling

2003-02-24 Thread Gary L. Nunn
Warning, this post is the result of a long day and a tired mind mixed with a little bit of sentimentality, so no flames, virtual bricks or snide comments please :-) I am not a big believer in signs or astrology, but sometimes the coincidences are simply too amazing. And sometimes the horoscopes