> Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Nick Arnett wrote:
> > >That makes sense. To what extent do you regard
> conservatives, as a
> > >generalization, as male-dominated?
> > In all honesty none.
> >
> > I can say with a clear conscience t
At 07:51 PM 1/15/2004 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote:
>John wrote:
>
>
>JDG - And did I mention that apparently I support lying to and deceiving
>the American public too?
>
>I'm sorry that you took my comments personally.
Thank you.For what it is worth, I did not take your comments at all
nearly
"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> At 10:21 PM 1/14/2004 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:
> >> At 06:54 PM 1/14/2004 -0800 Nick Arnett wrote:
> >> >That makes sense. To what extent do you regard conservatives, as a
> >> >generalization, as male-dominated?
> >>
> >> In all honesty none.
> >>
> >> I can say with
John wrote:
JDG - And did I mention that apparently I support lying to and deceiving
the American public too?
I'm sorry that you took my comments personally. I do not believe that you
support the dishonest policies of the Bush
administration; I know that you do not believe that they are being
d
At 10:21 PM 1/14/2004 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:
>> At 06:54 PM 1/14/2004 -0800 Nick Arnett wrote:
>> >That makes sense. To what extent do you regard conservatives, as a
>> >generalization, as male-dominated?
>>
>> In all honesty none.
>>
>> I can say with a clear conscience that I have never ever m
- Original Message -
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: The GOP Problem With Women
> At 06:54 PM 1/14/2004 -0800 Nick Arnett wrote:
> >
At 06:54 PM 1/14/2004 -0800 Nick Arnett wrote:
>That makes sense. To what extent do you regard conservatives, as a
>generalization, as male-dominated?
In all honesty none.
I can say with a clear conscience that I have never ever made that
connection in my mind before.
JDG
_
John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 10:58 AM 1/14/2004 -0800 Nick Arnett wrote:
Let me see if I understand. Conservatives, who by definition favor
traditional ways of doing things, tend to vote along the lines of the
status quo, preserving male domination of political power.
And this is news? Who else
At 08:11 PM 1/14/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
>> From: John D. Giorgis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> JDG - Who in the last hour alone has been accused of vigorously
>supporting
>> people who by definition support the subjugation of women, the return
>of
>> seggregation, increases in income inequality as q
> From: John D. Giorgis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> JDG - Who in the last hour alone has been accused of vigorously
supporting
> people who by definition support the subjugation of women, the return
of
> seggregation, increases in income inequality as quickly as possible,
and
> the impoverhing of people
At 10:58 AM 1/14/2004 -0800 Nick Arnett wrote:
>Let me see if I understand. Conservatives, who by definition favor
>traditional ways of doing things, tend to vote along the lines of the
>status quo, preserving male domination of political power.
>
>And this is news? Who else is going to be cons
> From: Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Fool wrote:
>
> > The GOP Problem With Women
> >
> >
<<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A5050-2004Jan9?language=printer
> >
> >
> > By Richard Morin
> >
> > Sun
The Fool wrote:
The GOP Problem With Women
<<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A5050-2004Jan9?language=printer
By Richard Morin
Sunday, January 11, 2004; Page B05
Men and women may have achieved equality in many areas of American life,
but they sure aren't treated
The GOP Problem With Women
<<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A5050-2004Jan9?language=printer
>>
By Richard Morin
Sunday, January 11, 2004; Page B05
Men and women may have achieved equality in many areas of American life,
but they sure aren't treated the same by R
14 matches
Mail list logo
