Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-11 Thread Andrew Crystall
Just found a possible soloution for this, actually. http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/tweakui general tab, stop applications from stealing focus Andy Dawn Falcon ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-09 Thread David Hobby
Erik Reuter wrote: On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:06:23AM -0600, The Fool wrote: Proxomitron is better. All hail Proxomitron. Oh wait erik can't use it... Proxomitron is dead. http://www.proxomitron.org/ Still working on my machine, though. It's not dead, just no longer

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-09 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 06:55:28PM -0500, David Hobby wrote: Still working on my machine, though. It's not dead, just no longer supported! I regret to say the Proxomitron web filter is well and truly dead. --the author -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-09 Thread The Fool
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 06:55:28PM -0500, David Hobby wrote: Still working on my machine, though. It's not dead, just no longer supported! I regret to say the Proxomitron web filter is well and truly dead. --the author When Mozilla can apply

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-09 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 06:55:28PM -0600, The Fool wrote: When Mozilla can apply filters to http tracfic like this: [uninformative example deleted] Let me know. Mozilla can already filter everything necessary for a pleasant web experience. If you want to give an example of a URL that you

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-09 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 9 Nov 2003 at 18:55, David Hobby wrote: Erik Reuter wrote: On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:06:23AM -0600, The Fool wrote: Proxomitron is better. All hail Proxomitron. Oh wait erik can't use it... Proxomitron is dead. http://www.proxomitron.org/ Still working on my machine,

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-08 Thread The Fool
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:31:15PM -, Andrew Crystall wrote: He's complaining about perfectly legitimate websites which, when they finish loading, set themselves as the active window. That IS annoying, but hardly the pop ups you're thinking of.

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-08 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:06:23AM -0600, The Fool wrote: Proxomitron is better. All hail Proxomitron. Oh wait erik can't use it... Proxomitron is dead. http://www.proxomitron.org/ -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ ___

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-08 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:17:32AM -0600, The Fool wrote: Proxomitron needs no more improvement. Yeah, and the web isn't changing, either. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-08 Thread The Fool
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:17:32AM -0600, The Fool wrote: Proxomitron needs no more improvement. Yeah, and the web isn't changing, either. I guess I Don't add new filters all the time. ___

Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread John D. Giorgis
Some websites have a feature that causes the web browser or some other window to jump to the top of the screen when it finishes loading. This is, of course, highly annoying for multi-taskers like myself.Does anybody know of a way to turn this feature off? JDG

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread The Fool
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some websites have a feature that causes the web browser or some other window to jump to the top of the screen when it finishes loading. This is, of course, highly annoying for multi-taskers like myself.Does anybody know of a way to turn this

RE: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread Chad Cooper
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Web Browser Question Some websites have a feature that causes the web browser or some other window to jump to the top of the screen when it finishes loading. This is, of course, highly annoying for multi

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread The Fool
From: Chad Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a form of popup. You can try using a popup preventer. Turing off active x, javascript and the like only results in broken pages, which can be annoying, if you have to change settings to see a page correctly. Nerd From Hell Says you. I never have

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 6 Nov 2003 at 14:59, The Fool wrote: From: Chad Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a form of popup. You can try using a popup preventer. Turing off active x, javascript and the like only results in broken pages, which can be annoying, if you have to change settings to see a page

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread CJ Kucera
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:11:13PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote: Some websites have a feature that causes the web browser or some other window to jump to the top of the screen when it finishes loading. This is, of course, highly annoying for multi-taskers like myself.Does anybody know of

RE: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread Chad Cooper
Says you. I never have any problems. I lose perspective since I work with corporate web-based applications that require these things turned on. For running many corporate apps, it is a requirement. Chad ___

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread The Fool
From: Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 6 Nov 2003 at 14:59, The Fool wrote: From: Chad Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a form of popup. You can try using a popup preventer. Turing off active x, javascript and the like only results in broken pages, which can be annoying,

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Web Browser Question Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:22:27 - On 6 Nov 2003 at 14:59, The Fool wrote: From: Chad Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a form

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread The Fool
From: Chad Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Says you. I never have any problems. I lose perspective since I work with corporate web-based applications that require these things turned on. For running many corporate apps, it is a requirement. Isn't that why internet explorer has 'zones'?

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread Reggie Bautista
Chad Cooper wrote: It's a form of popup. You can try using a popup preventer. Turing off active x, javascript and the like only results in broken pages, which can be annoying, if you have to change settings to see a page correctly. Nerd From Hell The Fool replied: Says you. I never have any

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 6 Nov 2003 at 16:41, Reggie Bautista wrote: Chad Cooper wrote: It's a form of popup. You can try using a popup preventer. Turing off active x, javascript and the like only results in broken pages, which can be annoying, if you have to change settings to see a page correctly.

RE: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread ChadCooper
Um. People... You didn't read what he said. He's complaining about perfectly legitimate websites which, when they finish loading, set themselves as the active window. That IS annoying, but hardly the pop ups you're thinking of. Hey wait a minute... I said it was a form of popup. It is

Re: Web Browser Question

2003-11-06 Thread Erik Reuter
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:31:15PM -, Andrew Crystall wrote: He's complaining about perfectly legitimate websites which, when they finish loading, set themselves as the active window. That IS annoying, but hardly the pop ups you're thinking of. Nevertheless, the person who suggested the