Re: [brlcad-devel] Agreement to participation requirements and expectations

Izak already knows as we discussed it earlier, but for the few of you that still need to respond -- be aware that the below reply is insufficient. Your agreement with our terms cannot be replaced with your own interpretation (e.g., "as follows") of the terms. You need to say you agree to our

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC applicants

On May 30, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Navdeep Bagga wrote: > Can I get a chance to work with developer now? > because I want to continue my work on proposal. Absolutely. You don't need to ask permission to work in open source, you just start working on things. If you don't know how or what to start wo

[brlcad-devel] GSoC applicants

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > I'm glad to hear that you are interested in feedback. I presume you'd like > the feedback in private since you didn't specifically state otherwise. If > you'd like it to be public, you are welcome to forward any response to the

[brlcad-devel] Agreement to participation requirements and expectations

I, Isaac Kamga , do hereby state that I have read the BRL-CAD *Summer of Code/Expectations* and agree to abide by the Participation and behaviour expectations as follows; Work for about 40 hours weekly on my project. Be self-motivated , work daily and frequently log my activities. Get

Re: [brlcad-devel] Confirmation for GSoC-2013

On May 30, 2013, at 03:40 PM, kEsHa sHaH wrote:I had been a bit shy posting to step-code's mailing list but yes I will do most of the discussion related to project openly unless personal matter to discuss.No need to be shy.  We really do love having new contributors. :) There has been one more poi

[brlcad-devel] Confirmation for GSoC-2013

Hi, Thanks first of all for my selection. I hereby agree with the participation requirements of BRL-CAD. >> Kesha, your work is double as you should be openly communicating with both the STEPcode community and BRL-CAD simultaneously. I had been a bit shy posting to step-code's mailing list but

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC applicants

On May 30, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Jasleen Kaur wrote:On 30 May 2013 20:30, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > On May 30, 2013, at 09:22 AM, Navdeep Bagga wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison > wrote: > >> I am

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC applicants

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Priyanka Kapoor wrote: > Please give feedback on my proposal too Cross Platform 2D framebuffer -- Priyanka Kapoor priyankacool10.wordpress.com Linux User Group, Ludhiana -- Introducing

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC applicants

On 30 May 2013 20:30, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > On May 30, 2013, at 09:22 AM, Navdeep Bagga wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison > wrote: > >> I am more than happy to share specific proposal feedback for any student >> (accepted or rejected) on your prop

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC applicants

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > On May 30, 2013, at 09:22 AM, Navdeep Bagga wrote: > > I would like to get feedback on my material database proposal. It > helps me to start working on it. > > > Responded in private. Please give feedback on my proposal too. I a

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC applicants

On May 30, 2013, at 09:22 AM, Navdeep Bagga wrote:On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > I am more than happy to share specific proposal feedback for any student (accepted or rejected) on your proposal if you are interested. I will respond to any feed

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC applicants

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > I am more than happy to share specific proposal feedback for any student > (accepted or rejected) on your proposal if you are interested. I will > respond to any feedback requests in private, unless you specifically state > o