Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I propose the following doc patch (last attachment).
Looks fine, thanks. You might want to add version numbers. I
confirmed that the dtksh bug still exists in Solaris 10.
> And I propose that your patch be reverted and replaced by something
> mi
Hello,
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:37:11AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> If we can come up with something nicer that still avoids the bugs,
> that'd be good. But let's not revert the patch until we have
> something nicer in hand.
sure, that's a good rule.
First, let me mention what I see as the ma
(Sorry for the wide distribution, but I wasn't sure who would be
affected, and wanted to seek advice.)
Eric Blake from m4 (thanks Eric) asked about the coding standards:
And since dvi et. al are not invoked by 'make all', it is not
obvious whether 'make install-dvi' should depend on dvi o
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
> I installed this patch, which works around this particular problem by
> not using shell expansion at all in the here-documents used to create
> defines.sed. However, other instances of this problem lurk in
> AC_LANG_SOURCE(C), _AC_INIT_HELP, _AC_DEFINE_Q,
